Help Wanted: Rock and Roll Nurse

And you’re a prima ballerina on a spring afternoon…

David Johansen

I am positively crushed by the news that David Johansen has Stage 4 Brain Cancer. While not particularly well-versed in malignancy protocols, I will assume that as little anyone wants to hear the term Brain Cancer, the experienced is rendered worse by the affixing of Stage 4 at the beginning of the phrase.

Accompanying his daughter’s announcement of same (and adding salt to the proverbial wound) was the disclosure that the family is broke and needs external help to finance his care.

But let’s back up a bit. I’ve a good deal to share about my man David Jo, and, seeing as how I am finding the current landscape of the Capital Economy virtually indiscernible, I’m gonna go ahead and share it.

For the uninitiated, David is the founding lead singer/principal songwriter for the divine New York Dolls, who exploded on the scene in the early ‘70s and paved the way for virtually every glam/punk outfit that came after. They were local boys who dressed up in stilettos and makeup yet attacked with such massive masculine energy as to astonish everyone who encountered them.

The story of The Dolls is one that has been repeated many times throughout history. A quick rise to fame. An inability to sustain the surge. Years of obscurity for most of the players, albeit with flashes of brilliance along the way. And, of course, it is a tale rife with bitter tragedy.

To wit — just as they were conducting their first studio sessions for their magnificent self-titled album, their original drummer: Billy Murcia, stuffed to the gills with barbiturates and alcohol, drowned, Jim Morrison style, in a bathtub at age 21. He is forever immortalized in a Bowie classic (“Tim in quaaludes and red wine, demanding Billy Dolls, and other friends of mine”). They replaced him with Jerry Nolan, who made it to 45. Their other frontman – Johnny Thunders – perished from a heroin overdose in 1991. He as Fellow guitarist/Syrian Jew Sylvain Sylvain nearly lived out his natural 3-Score/10, and would’ve celebrated his 74th birthday on Valentines Day. But then there’s bassist Arthur (Killer) Kane, who like Sid Vicious after him, could barely play a note, but who, at > 6.5 feet tall (and this without his platform boots) was perhaps the most visibly outrageous member of a visually outrageous band.

The Dolls: Syl, Johnny, Killer, Nolan and David:


When The Dolls split up, he bounced around the scene a bit, and then disappeared. In 2004, leading Dollsoligist Morrisey undertook to find him, and eventually located him in a Los Angeles Mormon mission, where he lived/served as Assistant Librarian. He roused him to play a reunion gig at the at that year’s Meltdown Festival – held in late June at London’s Royal Festival Hall.

Having done so, Killer Kane returned to the Latter-Day stacks of his L.A. library. And died 22 days later.

Which leaves only Johansen. He put out a couple of great post-Dolls solo records, and then, improbably, completely revamped his image, rocked a pompadour, and assumed the handle of Buster Poindexter, under which he scored a series modest hits out of old Louis Prima covers like “Hot, Hot, Hot”. He even briefly served in this new persona as the leader of the Saturday Night Live Band.

I saw him early in his Poindexting days, at a gig at Columbia University. I wasn’t digging his new image and so I was the guy who kept yelling “Vietnamese Baby” and “Personality Crisis” from the crowd, which I don’t think he appreciated. But ultimately he took my advice – ditched BP and became DJ once again.

And now he lays dying of Brain Cancer at his Tribeca home. And looking for financial support to ease his last days. I took the lead and stroked him a few bucks. And you can do the same, at:

https://www.sweetrelief.org/davidjohansenfund.html

What on earth we will do without him is another question, but as Napoleon once said: “the graveyards are full of indispensable men”. It is my fear that few will note, or even notice, his demise. No matter I reckon, there are those of us who will feel the full extent of this loss and continue to honor him — as long as the band plays on.

How transient our existence, how quickly that which we hold most dear crumbles to dust, paves the way for something new! I was further reminded of this when contemplating the reality that the #1 and #2 rated NCAA hoops squads faced off this Saturday. Duke vs. Kentucky? Kansas against Connecticut?

Nay – Alabama matched up against Auburn – not simply for roundball bragging rights in their shared eponymous state, but for the top spot on the whole Coaches Poll. Of course, this would make all the sense in the world if we were talking football. But we’re not. The hated gridiron rivals who match up annually in the Iron Bowl have fallen on hard, hundred-yard times. The Tigers finished dead last in the reconstituted SEC, and while the Tide were competitive, they defied downward expectations by failing to make the expanded tourney.

However, on Saturday, in the parallel universe which we currently occupy, the #1-Ranked Auburn Basketball Tigers defeated the #2-Ranked Alabama Crimson Basketball Tide by a score of 94 to 95.

So, the denizens of the Sweet Home State are rim-ward ascendent — as the finest hoopsters from historical hotbeds such as Carolina and Indiana (the latter another basketball haven which somehow sent its long- suffering football team to the above-mentioned championship round) are relegated to the 2nd tier.

But the Tide rolls on. The old replaced by the new. Barring some miracle, David Doll is close to breathing his last, leaving me wondering how he ended up broke. Clearly, he failed to invest the royalties dolled out with parsimony by Mercury Records back in ’73, because the generic broad basket of stocks he might’ve owned has delivered a 60-bagger in the two generations since these records dropped.

And, as the final bell rang on Friday’s session, it tolled in a new all-time high for Col. Naz, with the Gallant 500 coming within a whisper (1 skinny index point) of achieving the same feat. I am partially surprised by these tidings, but then I remember my long-standing mantra that the investing world is laden down with too much cash, chasing an insufficient inventory of available securities to satiate its appetites. Under these circumstances, it is no wonder that participants are tending to shrug off the bad and embrace the good.

Macro data was mixed this week, with both CPI and PPI clocking in above expectations, to the disappointment of those hoping for improbable incremental relief from the Fed. Then, on Friday, and to the apparent delight of at least a few, the Labor Department offered, as promised, a glimpse at January Retail Sales. It was a train wreck. So, naturally, investors decided it was time to buy.

And now the data flow trails off. Nothing is scheduled on the tape until Wednesday week, when NVDA will breathlessly report its results. Probably, the market moves on these utterings, but a) they’re a fortnight off, and b) after that it’s bubkes – probably for the rest of the quarter.

Which of course will train all avaricious eyes on Washington, where the action remains hot and heavy. I can’t even keep track of doings issuing from that quarter, but it seems as though, from a foreign policy perspective, those with whom we have beefs large and small have taken notice of our less-effete attitudes, and are, for now, responding in ways which we hoped they would.

Closer to home, there is a frenzied race on both sides of the spectrum to outflank one another in hysteria as to the appropriateness (or lack thereof) of the World’s Richest Man being granted access to the closely held books of key agencies. For my part, I doubt this will do much harm (though how much good it will do is an open question), but I will cop to being troubled by what appears to me to be a thus-far successful effort by Musk, his boss and his boss’s family to monetize their positions of power. My gut tells me that there will be a price to pay for these actions, and I reckon that it will be the electorate (including sympathetic but non-partaking outsiders such as myself) who will bear the brunt of it.

All of which leaves my mindset more or less where it’s been all along. I don’t foresee a sustainable rally on the cards for us, but I am as certain as I can be that barring some unforeseen disaster, any selloff will be short-lived and of minor magnitude.

Outside of a Trumpian tape bomb, it’s likely to be boring. I think you can buy in safely here, and if nothing else moves you, do it for David.

The Dolls once did a cover of a great Bo Didley track called “Pill”, wherein the hook line goes “I was lying in a hospital bed, a rock and roll nurse went to my head”.

And now David not only needs a nurse but must find a way to pay her. You can help.

A rock and roll nurse absolutely, but she probably need not be a Prima Ballerina, and only heaven knows if he’ll make it to enjoy another spring afternoon.

If he did it would be a Godsend, and, failing all else, I will spare a prayer for same.

TIMSHEL

Slowing the Roll?

I wanna tell you, now’s the time, I wanna tell you that you’re goin’ to be mine,
I can’t tell you how I feel, my heart is like a wheel,
Let me roll it, let me roll it, let me roll it, to you

Paul McCartney

Finding the thematic cupboards a bit bare this week, I am forced to resort to the trudging over ancient, over-travelled ground, from both an allegorical and substantive perspective.

First the allegorical. Our title owes itself to Paul, from a Wings work called “Band on the Run”.

I didn’t want to like this album, released in 1973 as, somehow, in less that 3 years, his 5th post-Beatles LP. It was overplayed to be sure. Paul, by that time had not only swapped the mercenary Linda in and John out but he and his wife were dubiously rocking twin Bowie-esque (Aladdin Sane vintage) mullets, and it seemed as all we held dear was rapidly crumbling before our eyes.

But I’ll be switched if this is not a solid record — one that has admirably stood the test of time. The Title Song, “Jet”, “Hellen Wheels”, and of course the above-purloined number (which may be the best track of all) reinforce the point.

I could say more but won’t, and instead will force myself to move to the substantive.

At present, in a trend that shows no signs of decelerating, almost all relevant news issues forth from Washington. Blink over the Beltway these days, and you’re likely to have missed something important. And as is axiomatic from a market perspective, the more that the pertinent the information flow derives from our national capital, the worse off investors are likely to find themselves.

Plus, I hate writing about Washington, have a desire to channel neither Woodward, nor Bernstein. But the tidal wave of action emanating from that quarter renders me, for the most part, choiceless.

Even last week, in my probing analysis of the DeepSeek phenomenon, I was forced to dedicate a couple of paragraphs to Public Policy, wherein I expressed the wish that the Big Guy would slow his roll.

He has instead taken the opposite tack, and – not gonna lie – it’s making me a bit nervous.

In three weeks since removing his hand from that bible, he has moved towards the firing of tens if not hundreds of thousands of government workers, has adopted territorially acquisitive rhetoric towards a half dozen currently sovereign jurisdictions, laid the foundation for trade wars with > 75% of our global commercial partners, rounded up untold numbers of undocumented migrants designated for deportment, glibly hinted at an extra-Constitutional 3rd term, and, most menacing in my judgement, made the following dubious forays into the Private Capital Markets.

I’ve already begun my tirade about $TRUMP – a new crypto unit owned and controlled by the Leader of the Free World. A president with his own currency. What could be better? What could go wrong? Not enough space here to express my outrage here — but remember – you heard it here first: this will end badly for all of us.

And now, we’re floating the idea of a Sovereign Wealth Fund: a private investment pool controlled by the government, like they have in the Emirates and Scandinavia, where they are drowning in the revenues generated by fossil fuel production. Our own Balance Sheet, sadly, tells a different story, approaching $40 trillion in unfunded liabilities and expanding that tally at a pace of ~$2 trillion/year.

OMG: where to start? Aside from the mundane but holier alternative of using these funds to pay down, or at least impede the increase, of our mind-boggling indebtedness, there is the question of size. Papa Bear will surely want to go bigly. There are currently about a half-dozen Sovereign Wealth Fund with assets > $1 trillion. The largest of these is Norwegian (~$1.7T), followed by Chinese vintages: two such pools that combine to a tidy $2.5T.

So, anything less than $3T or, better, $4T, would be a stone-cold embarrassment.

Who invests this hoard and how it is deployed is another cause for worry. Consider, by way of example, an incisive analyst who (after extensive research) determines that the best asset in the whole damned universe is $TRUMP. And wouldn’t that be nice for those with the foresight to adhere to the President’s agenda? Heck, he could walk away from his 2nd (certain to be final no matter what he says) term as the world’s first trillionaire. He is also able to either light up his bestie Elon, or, if the latter displeases him, to render him, from a financial perspective at any rate, sorry he was ever born.

More likely is a diversified hodgepodge of assets – with or without Tiktok – at sizes which cannot help but move markets (not a good thing). And that’s before it gets political. Which it will. No matter what anyone says. Big Guy: a word to the risk management wise – maybe give this a miss.

There’s also talk of a T-branded ETF investment platform which… No. I. Just. Can’t.

All the above has one other thing in common – the absence of engagement with the Legislative Branch of Government. Nothing undertaken or contemplated thus far and to the best of my knowledge, involves the bothersome protocol of Checks and Balances.

Presumably, the administration will eventually be compelled to map at least some of his agenda through those Marble Halls of Capitol Hill, and I fear that all this other activity will, at minimum, be distracting, if not outright dilutive, to his objectives.

All of which has virtually obliterated the non-Oval Office news cycle, which, under more normal conditions, would have been meaty enough on its own.

The Fed has taken a modestly hawkish turn, GDP remains robust, the dubious, confusing jobs report showed continued energetic demand for Labor.

The earnings season has moved past its peak, and the results were, at best mixed. 6 of the 7 now-MAGA Mags have weighed in, and only NVDA remains for us to absorb.

Several trading sessions after the DeepSeek puke, it appears to me that our omnipotent chip maker will be just fine, as all signs point towards, if anything, accelerated GPU demand. To wit: 1) two of the big barking dogs (MSFT and AMZN) experienced selloffs due to admitting that their computing capacity is failing to keep up with expanding demand, and 2) ALL of these titans are doubling down on their AI investments, DeepSeek be damned:

It’s hard for me to view this as being anything but accretive to NVDA.

And the indexes, while bouncing around modestly all week, ended on a low note, absorbing, as they did, a triple-whammy of bad news, including a sucky AMZN earnings report, a set of Employment statistics that gave the lie to anyone in a parallel universe still clinging to irrational hope of additional imminent rate cuts, and, (not to be outdone) some additional Trumpian Tariff saber rattling.

In result, the markets are deeply underperforming the wild MAGA optimism of a few weeks hence. Our indices are barely registering a positive pulse, with Col. Naz showing a vapit 1.1% ytd gain. And if you want to understand how bad that is, consider that the IBEX 35 is up ~9.5%:

Spain is Kicking our Asses:

Like the late, great Hoyt Axton once wrote, I never been to Spain, but I kinda like the music. I hope someday to get there.

But of this much, I am sure. We didn’t elect these clowns to witness those lazy Spaniards beating us by a factor of nearly 9.

At some point, while not necessarily abuse it, we’re gonna have to use it, because we can’t refuse it.

 

And my unifying theory is that investors are partially rejecting the rapidity of Trump’s roll.

Which is a shame because this here market is dying to go up, and, I feel, only the chaos emanating from 47’s frenzied flurry of activity is impeding it from doing so.

He did indeed tell us that now’s the time, that we were going to be his. So, we let him roll it to us. And now we must take the consequences, whatever they may be.

TIMSHEL

ShallowHide?

So long Marianne, it’s time we began,
To laugh and cry, to laugh and cry, about it all again

Leonard Cohen

A quick farewell to Marianne Faithful: musician, artist, actress. Mick’s Muse, Lady Jane, Ruby Tuesday, the girl, who, once had him down. She was (I just learned) also the inspiration for the Hollies’ Carrie Anne, and she left us this past Thursday.

****

Not that I had any intention of doing so, but the week’s headline market news is impossible to ignore. In the early hours of Monday morning, a near-panic emerged based on a heretofore unknown Chinese startup called DeepSeek’s having replicated, or bested, on a corroborated basis, some of the industry’s most fully rendered Artificial Intelligence models. Producing similar, if not superior results to its largest competitors — at a (purported) fraction of the cost in terms of time and investment, relative to the outlays issuing from the behemoths that were destined to lead us into the AI promised land.

The primary victim was NVDA, who, of a sudden, may see the up-till-now insatiable demand for its most expensive Graphics Processing Units (GPUs), driven as they have been lately by the needs of AI model developers, diminish materially. Contemporaneously, Monday’s selloff caused the largest one-day valuation loss — +/- $1 trillion, in market history, with over half of it being borne by NVDA itself.

Friends, we are, to the best of my knowledge, in uncharted territory here. Never in my long experience had any previously anonymous enterprise dropped news of a paradigm-shifting productivity advancement, seemingly out of nowhere, and causing such a dramatic rethink of the investment models driving the current Global Capital Markets risk allocation assumptions. There were other puzzling aspects as well, notably that the news of the new model was a week old ere the market reacted, and that the entire project was nothing more than a side gig for an energetic quant whose main job is to run an $8B hedge fund.

So, my first reaction was one of significant skepticism, because this here development, extravagantly extrapolated, is the equivalent of announcing, say, in the late 19th Century, that not only had someone developed a flying machine, but had put in place a framework that would, in the veritable blink of an eye, substantially replace the commuter rail system as the preferred means of long-distance travel. Plus, not to be xenophobic or anything, but the breakthrough originated in China, where it pays to allot some suspicion in anything to do with investment, causing me to look at the whole thing with a jaundiced eye.

But by all accounts, these dudes are on to something, and thus, while part of me would really like to run with our titular antithetical nomenclature of ShallowHide (which an internet search indicates belongs to me), I must also disclaim that this may be anything but applicable to the current tidings.

It is important to home in with precision on what caused the big Monday puke. Nobody is legitimately concerned that DeepSeek, which is not a chip manufacturer but rather a crafty user of same, is destined to displace the likes of GOOOOOOG, META, AAPL or AMZN as premium purveyors of the Artificial Intelligence services to the masses. Rather, the notion that instead of spending hundreds of millions or billions thought to be required to create said services, they can instead be developed for a paltry few million – an amount of capital to which virtually any schmuck on the street can access – is one that suggests maybe our chip foundries are not worth the lofty valuations with which the wisdom of the markets has honored them.

Longer term, the closer Monday’s tape bomb is to the truth, the better off we’ll all be. If one believes in even 1/4th of the promise that AI acolytes insist awaits us, then we’re, by my judgment, less than 5% of the way to our destiny of Artificial Nirvana (Nirvartificial?). And if so: a) we’re gonna need all the GPUs upon which we can lay our hands, and b) the cheaper this input becomes, the quicker and more comprehensive the transformation will be. Though the DS models are Open Source, I don’t expect the Chinese to simply gift us this bounty. But our own engineers are bound to figure out what they did – perhaps sooner than we can imagine — and will act accordingly.

All of which has caused the Financial Press to dust off one of the more obscure (but nonetheless essential) tidbits from the economic textbooks – called Jevon’s Paradox, which posits that tech advancements which add efficiency to the use of finite supply input cause the overall demand to increase:

I was never sure why this was ever considered a Paradox. It strikes me that in a competitive market, reduced production costs catalyze lower prices, which, of course, goose demand.

I reckon, though, that’s beside the point. That we consume more at lower prices is a rule on the first tablet of the 10 Economic Commandments. But are the producers better off as a result? Only if the area defined by the length of Lines B and D is greater of that of A*C. And in the case of those powerful GPUs, we just don’t know. Yet.

So, these things were bound to take an annoying bite out of the price of NVDA and its lesser peers – under the plausible hypothesis that it may take some time before Area BD exceeds that of AC. Jevon suggests we’ll get there, and I believe we will. But I am observing many portfolios, including my own, which, having feasted so long on this name, may now have to go on an NVDA diet.

But the way this all unfolded – seemingly out of nowhere — makes me wonder, and, perhaps unsurprisingly, by mid-week, the markets had regained, if not their vigor, then at least their equanimity. The informed consensus, including that of NVDA management, is that this breakthrough is a joyful event. Do they believe this? Are they just talking their books? Is the whole thing real? Tough to say.

Meantime, the Fed held steady. Powell was kinda mean. Q4 GDP came in a titch light. MSFT, AAPL (and others) reported, and the former got smacked – ironically because of a dilutive shortage of the storage capacity it sells. The earnings season is in mid-crescendo, and does not appear as though, when finished, it will have moved the needle over-much in either direction.

I have not been made aware of any direct focus on DeepSeek in CEO podium star-turns, which is probably a good thing. One pending implication that puzzles me though is the potential impact on crypto. As I write this out, the asset class is down a few percent from its lofty highs. And I wonder: is it susceptible to the AI-driven Jevon’s Paradox? After all, BTC coins are created through algorithms, which might very well be incrementally empowered by uber-efficient applications of GPUs, in that case causing an increase in supply that won’t be accretive to those buying in at 6-digits. Same with other tokens – new or existing. No clue here, but thought I’d share….

Beyond all the above, the Washingtonian psychodrama is in high gear. The new administration is in whirling dervish mode, and as time marches forward, the key Trumpian question emerges with greater clarity. Having won a second astonishing victory, he could then adopt one of two subsequent attitudes. Channeling Dr. Jekyll, he could find some serenity in the realization that he had nothing left to prove, and proceed, lessons learnt, with his agenda in wisdom and probity. In Hydeian Converse, he could go off halfcocked, determined to perpetually remind everyone concerned just who’s in charge of this here joint.

This past week was, from this perspective, far from encouraging, as, rather than slowing his Big Orange Roll, he, chose to quicken it. Examples abound, including his clumsy Executive Order blocking about $3T of Federal Grants, which, as was perhaps inevitable, a judge suspended in Usain Bolt speed, forcing our Leader to rescind it. Lots of what he blocked deserved said blocking, but doing so in one fell swoop, less than a fortnight into his tenure, was about as effective as it ought to be. He’s making menacing gestures towards Panama, blaming that unfortunate DC air crash on DEI.

Capping off the week was his make-good of his tariff threat, slapping 25% on our neighbors north and south and 10% on China. In trademark, statesmanlike fashion, he informed us that we don’t need the stuff that we buy from Mexico and Canada anyway. But I suspect we’re still gonna buy that Canadian Bacon and those Mexican Tamales, paying an extra two bits to the dollar for the privilege of doing so.

No doubt he feels empowered by his successful saber-rattling at Columbia, from whom we import 20% of our Coffee. Yes, they backed down, but Java/Joe is nonetheless nearly a double over the last rolling year, and up > 10% since our Diet-Coke-preferring Leader took office.

I can probably afford the incremental levies on these imported dainties, which I consume with moderation at any rate (except Coffee, which I chug by the gallon). And the market will probably roll on as well. But I say that 47 is giving aid and comfort to his political enemies, who will extract a price, not from him but rather from us.

And I encourage anyone believing that the world was taking a turn to the authentic should bear in mind that this past weekend, the LA Lakers traded their oft-injured, 31-year-old Power Forward Anthony Davis for the NBA Scoring Champ, 5-time 1st Team All Pro Luka Doncic, who, at 25 years, carried his Dallas team to last year’s finals. This smacks of the doofuses in the NBA Home Office, engineering yet another one-sided transaction, in the hopes of boosting their ossifying product with yet another cycle of putrid Lakers-Celtics finals, replete with LeBron swansong motifs. They always pull this shit, but this ain’t Wilt vs. Russ, and the NBA, save for providing yet another reason to root against the Lakers, just, somehow became even more unwatchable. If it doesn’t work, they can always increase the number of steps allowed before a travelling whistle is contemplated from 8 to, say, 10.

Or eliminate the dribbling requirement altogether.

All of which proves both how shallow everything sometimes is, and how few places there are to hide from the madness.

Maybe the answer resides in those newfangled DeepSeek AI models. But you won’t find me looking there. Because, sometimes, the greatest comfort I take in this world is to operate under my well-earned status as a curmudgeon.

TIMSHEL

Arcadian (Canadian) Driftwood

Acadian driftwood, Gypsy tailwind
They call my home, The land of snow
Canadian cold front, Movin’ in
What a way to ride, Oh what a way to go

Jaime Royal “Robbie” Robertson

Friends, another monument has indeed toppled. Garth Hudson, oldest but nonetheless last surviving member of that iconic ensemble known as The Band, has gathered to his dust. He died in Woodstock — appropriately, as that was the locus of some of the group’s most legendary innings.

Garth hailed from just across the Canadian border: Windsor, ONT, which is basically a suburb of Detroit. He was rigidly brought up and classically trained – by parents who themselves were musicians. As described in the magnificent “Last Waltz” documentary of their farewell performance, being afraid to tell his parents that he was joining a rock and roll outfit, he signed on as the group’s “music teacher” – at a compensation rate of $10/week. This was more than pretense; he actually charged his mates these rates for these services, through a point well beyond when their musical exploits were minting them millions.

But I have always been puzzled by The Band. They made their bones in Toronto’s sizzling 1960s music scene (as lively as that of jurisdictions such as London or San Francisco). Established incremental bona fides by backing up Dylan in his at-the-time-deemed -treacherous migration to electric music. Lived communally in a house they called Big Pink, in the above-named township of Woodstock, NY.

Throughout, they carried a reputation of epitomizing the best of what rock and roll had to offer — both musically and in lifestyle. In addition to Dylan (who spent 18 months with them at Big Pink, recording 100 songs now immortalized as “The Basement Tapes”), all the elite of the genre wanted to in.

Big Pink: West Saugerties New York (not much to look at but History inside):

Thus, during a Beatles Hiatus, George hung out with them and was so impressed with their demeanor and musical comportment that upon his return to London, he (temporarily) told John and Paul to sot off.

But there are, to my way of thinking, some chinks in their armor. They had some fine, arguably spectacular moments, but how many of their songs are truly memorable? A half dozen? A dozen? I struggle to get past this threshold.

Perhaps more importantly, after their Last-Waltz-documented swansong, the brotherly feeling which everyone else strove to emulate descended into vitriol and acrimony. Robbie Robertson – principal though non-exclusive songwriter, took the money and ran. The other guys resented this. Particularly their divine drummer Levon Helm. They reformed without Robbie but couldn’t make much of a go of it. Their haunted, underappreciated other keyboard genius: Richard Manuel, hung himself after a performance in 1986. Bassist Rick Danko died of cancer a few years later. Levon set up his own thing, back in Woodstock, where the greatest of the great sojourned to join his quaint, intimate, collaborative performances. But he never forgave Robbie — until, perhaps, on his deathbed, when the latter made a pilgrimage of apology. And, of course, we lost Robbie himself a year or two ago.

How a musical partnership, with enough audacious authenticity to call itself The Band — the crew which All God’s Children wished to emulate, ossified into the depths of acrimony, leaving behind so few memorable records, is something I’ll never understand.

But one prevailing, timely lesson we can derive from the saga is its illustration of the triumphs and tragedies of International Trade. They formed in Toronto as a backup to transplanted Arkansas homeboy Ronnie Hawkins, who brought fellow razorback Helm along for the ride. Having outgrown The Hawk, signed on with Dylan, and then went out on their own. Thus, arguably, Hawk imported them (or they imported him), and included American export Helm, and then Dylan ended up re-importing them.

And while it was in many ways a great run for all concerned, it ended in tragedy.

With shameless transition I note that The United States and Canada are now going nose to nose in a simmering trade battle. There’s a deadline this coming Saturday (Feb 1) by which time, if the latter has not toed the line, the former will impose a 25% tariff on goods they send down south. This amounts to >$100B/year. Approximately 30% of this is Lumber – including our titular driftwood.

The Canadians, not ones known to simply roll over and get stiffed, will, of course, respond. The two-way trade is roughly balanced and aggregates to >$900B. If this goes through, the two governments will thus be the recipients of more than $200B/year of incremental transfers from the Private Sector.

Call this what you will; I call it a tax. And I think that taken to its extreme, it continues to represent the largest threat out there to the continuance of the present market rally we are all enjoying.

I reckon that the good news here is that Trump, his frenzy of first week activity notwithstanding, did not go all gangbusters with tariffs – yet. Much of what he has socialized is already priced into valuations. Thus, unless he pulls a fast one (which, of course, he is entirely capable of pulling), the market can probably absorb this assault on free trade without much annoyance.

The early returns are indeed encouraging. Investors bought enthusiastically all week, before initiating a modest pause on Friday. In doing so, they shrugged off that wretched, annual Gathering-o-the-Hypocrites circus in Davos. On the other hand, published reports suggest that the forum splayed a much different vibe this year than in events past. In trademark self-interest, they ditched the green/woke (GWOKE?) rhetoric in favor of full-throated endorsements of the spirit of free enterprise. But then again, no one ever accused that crew of original thinking.

Thus far, though still in its early innings, what threatened to be a tetchy earnings season has been, on balance, encouraging. The battle unfolds in greater earnest this coming week, with Titans MSFT, META and AAPL all on the docket. Alphabet follows on 2/4, then AMZN (2/6) and, of course, we’ll have to wait until the end of February ere we hear howls from the biggest dog in the manger Mag Manger: NVDA.

The unmentioned member of the Mag 7: TSLA, which reports this Wednesday, is an interesting case. My own belief is that it is resting on a slippery soap bubble. Marshal Musk continues to suck all oxygen out of the joint, posting up a string of wins and losses that are breathtaking in their scope. On the plus side, he managed to two-tap his hedge fund partner at DOGE, which was perhaps inevitable. Not so good was an inadvertent gesture of his, captured on film, which the unhinged have likened to a Nazi salute. Please. A Nazi he may be, but my guess is that he’s smart enough to reserve his “sieg heils” — in favor of more opportune times.

But that he is making legions of enemies is undeniable. And, meantime, his baby TSLA is trading us up > 200% over the last rolling year, boasts an arguably optimistic Market Cap of $1.3 Trillion (> 10x that of Ford and General Motors combined, notwithstanding that the former sells more than more than twice the cares, and the latter more than three thrice, that of TSLA) and a less-than-shabby P/E of 193.

Presumably, investors are staking a great deal on his relationship with his Big Daddy, and perhaps this will bear fruit for his electric-powered auto outfit and other enterprises. But he may want to have a word with the Mooch respecting the latter’s experience during Trump 1, because (as one of my favorite clients points out), if that relationship turns sour, then TSLA is in serious trouble and may be the biggest short opportunity in recent memory.

But in my world, all eyes are trained on Miami and its annual Hedge Fund Week ritual. ’24 was a good for all concerned, and one can feel the frenzy – even from rigid climes of the Northeast. Fund Managers are swarming the place, waiving their most recent returns and expecting to unending rings of the allocation bell. Allocators are similarly giddy, particularly as they are, more than ever, Belles of the Ball.

This may work out great for all concerned. But I will state that I’ve seen this movie before, and its ending is always uncertain. Funds may depart the premises with their subscription tchotchke bags less than full, and allocators, believing that they have indeed found their next “can’t miss” revenue generators, may live to find disappointed hopes in future return cycles.

I don’t wish to be a Gloomy Gus here, but the current vibe reminds me a bit of the crossover from ’21 (Gallant 500 up ~27%) to ’22. When the former year ended, I was, I kid you not, perpetually buttonholed by investors of every stripe – professional and avocation-based – rushing to inform me that not only had they crushed it in the just-ended year, but had cracked the code in such a way as to ensure that the profits would keep rolling in.

By the end of ’22 (G5 down ~20%), they were singing an entirely different, much sadder, tune.

But I don’t wish to kill anyone’s buzz here. I do believe that the arrows are pointing up. Our resilient economy is gathering juice. Tax relief (which BETTER more than offset the tariff tolls) and regulatory relaxation should be accretive. And, short term, I believe that investors are apt to test the hypothesis that the good times are here and here to stay.

Problems, from that point, will, inevitably, ensue. They always do.

Before I take my leave, though, I offer the following rant which I believe to be exemplary of the types of problems we are bound to face in the visible future. In the days leading up to the Inauguration, the organization surrounding The President-elect saw fit to issue its own digital currency. In many ways, this is understandable – a matched set with his social media SPAC, both of which every Leader of the Free World needs. Adopting the clever handle $TRUMP, this new, most patriotic cryptocurrency sports a lofty valuation of ~$30B, 80% of which is controlled by insiders who are locked up until 3/4ths of Papa Bear’s term is in the rear-view mirror.

As someone who is sympathetic to the Trump project, who very much wants to see him succeed in his current endeavors, I am nonetheless shaking with anger at this. His holdings in this, er, asset, are worth an amount orders of magnitude greater than anything he’s ever sniffed in his Real Estate-manipulating, Reality TV show-hosting, SPAC-issuing life. The potential conflicts and attendant optics, too numerous to inventory in this space, are breathtaking in their scope. This little stunt drew scant coverage – even from hostile media actors. But God help us if something goes wrong here.

But to conclude on a more uplifting note, $TRUMP has leveled off after a few giddy, Inaugural- coincident sessions since its release.

$TRUMP:

Thus, the tide rolls, the driftwood floats, some to be harvested; some not. It all recalls for me images of Upstate NY, where, in the late ‘60s, in a non-descript pink house, some of the most legendary moments of rock and roll transpired.

It was great while it lasted, but like everything else, it ran its course, leaving, in this case, a legacy of bitterness that lasted for decades.

Maybe we’ll do better this time.

But now we’ll have to do it without Garth or any of his mates, and as such, it’s an open question.

TIMSHEL

Let’s Do the Time Warp Again

It’s just a jump to the left. And then a step to the right.

O’Brien/Hartley

Frank: Well, Brad, Janet, what do you think of my creation?
Janet: Well, I don’t like men with too many muscles.
Frank: Well, I didn’t make him for you!

Rocky Horror Picture Show

The time has come to celebrate the magnificent 1975 film “The Rocky Horror Picture Show”. Yes, this young year encompasses its Golden Anniversary, but that date is either April (U.K. Release) or September (US Release).

Meantime, the “Time Warp” motif should be obvious to all but the terminally obtuse, and we’ll get to it anon. But a word, first, about Rocky Horror – a low budget effort with a wandering, convoluted plot that somehow captured the imagination of my entire generation. As most are perhaps aware, its weekly midnight showings, complete with audience counter-script and props, originated/perpetuated at the Waverly in Greenwich Village, became a matter of longstanding ritual. I wasn’t a regular there, but went a couple of times, and it was, indeed, a hoot.

But audience participation aside, I believe the delights of the film derive principally from its wicked but well-meaning lampooning of many of the hangups of the time – our vanities, our fears, our fantastic delusions. Rather than analyzing, attacking and obliterating, the film seeks to celebrate them. And succeeds with decadent, inelegant flourish.

Meantime, in shameless setup, I now traverse to the Time Warp theme. We’ve managed to wind the clock back precisely eight years, where, on a windy platform in the Nation’s Capital, an overblown, overbearing Real Estate mogul will place his hand on the Bible and then assume occupancy of the same Oval Office he departed, amid multi-pronged chaos, exactly four years ago.

He brings with him a new cast of characters – hopefully less demented than “Rocky’s” Dr. Frank N Furter’s crew of Riff Raff, Magenta, and Columbia, but I reckon we’ll see. The only return performance from Trump 1 is assigned to Linda McMahon – co-founder of WWE, in the elevated from running the Small Business Administration to role of Education Secretary. Everyone else is new, except, of course, The Master of Ceremonies.

But in a very real sense, we’re entering, today, an 8-year Time Warp, with the country having just completed another jump to the left, is now preparing a repeat of its step to the right.

So, I thought it might be useful to refresh our memories as to what was going down exactly 8 years ago.

The markets, with valuations ~1/3rd of their present levels, continued their giddy upswing, begun in the pre-dawn hours after the ’16 election, when a world shocked by Trump’s drawing the political equivalent of an inside straight, first sold off hard and then ginned up a rally that took the markets from one high to the next, for the ensuing 20 months.

Crypto was all the rage, with Ferraris and Lambos endlessly buzzing 6th Avenue in what seemed like an infinite sequence of investor conferences. On Inauguration Day, BTC closed at a titch under $900. It enters the current festivities at approximately $105,000.

In 2017, the Best Performing Dow Stock was Boeing (up 89%), and if that doesn’t make you feel the change, I reckon nothing will. It closed on Trump’s swearing in at $160, and is now, endless sequence of disasters notwithstanding, trading at $170.

A little-known chip maker called NVDIA also made that year’s 10 list – entering 2017 at ~$2.50 and closing it at a near-double of ~$4.80. Back then, its rise was driven by the role its chips played in crypto mining. It has since deftly trained its sights on AI, and concluded Friday’s session at $137 and change, outpacing the performance of even BTC during our Time Warp interlude.

A passel of politicians boycotted the 2017 festivities, and up the road in Manhattan, Madonna was threatening to blow up the White House. But you know who was there?

OK, I know. That wasn’t the Trump 1 shindig, it was Biden’s 2021 swearing in. Still and all, I give Bernie credit for being there. It was cold, after all.

And this is to say nothing of the reality that the Party Bigs flat out stole the nomination from him and handed it to Blundering Joe Biden. We know what happened after that.

God Bless him, I say. There he was this past week, larger than life, grilling cabinet nominees, and looking, if anything, younger and more vigorous than he did in this famous image.

For the record, a maskless, mitten-less Bernie did attend the Trump 1 ceremony. But then again, like Biden in 2020, Hillary had robbed him of the nomination that time as well.

In March of that year, the Big Guy delivered his first State of the Union address, and Pelosi, consigned to the House minority, was not on the podium. However, two years later, having recaptured the Speaker’s post, she could be seen towards end session making dainty little tears in the transcript, before, upon conclusion of the speech, ostentatiously ripping it into shreds.

Also that month, the United States Budget Deficit – somehow – reached its Statutory Limit. After months of fenagling, our betters in Washington raised it, for the first time, to the now-quaint threshold of $20 Trillion. It currently is 80% above that mark (~$36T), and – oopsies – is poised for another breach on Tuesday, January 21st – eight years less one day ago.

Outgoing Treasury Secretary Yellen has written to inform Congress of same, referencing extraordinary measures that must be taken if legislators fail raise it yet again. I will cop to being puzzled by this language, because, by Tuesday, Sec Yell will be out of office, and presumably back in the leafy hills of Berkeley – up North and thus untouched by the fires – with her Nobel Laureate husband. It will thus be my boy Bessent’s problem by then. And Trump’s.

Finally for our purposes, that month featured a low ebb of Crude Oil prices, at an even $40/bbl. One must revert to the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks to observe a lower price, and, winding forward, to the early days of the lockdown, when the bubbling sticky Black Gold, improbably, though only for a few hours, traded in negative territory:

At just under $78/bbl, the commodity is nearly twice as expensive as it was at that point. This, in part, is owing to some sanctioning and offshore drill banning in which Ol’ Joe (along with some other shady stuff he pulled) engaged in the waning days of his dying administration.

That he is departing in anything other than a blaze of glory is obvious to all. But I can’t resist the temptation to reference one final, exemplary moment, when late last week, he unilaterally declared The Equal Rights Amendment to be officially ratified and demanded that it be affixed to the Constitution as #28. This, of course, notwithstanding that it failed to meet a couple of minor bureaucratic details – such as passage by 2/3rds majority in both Congressional Houses, and formal ratification by 3/4ths of the States.

It’s moments like these which will make me, from time to time, miss the old cuss.

Time, however, and whether warped or not, marches on. And now, as back in ’17, we can anticipate some heavy incremental action emanating from the Oil Patch, and with it, lower prices.

So, considering all the above, the main question remains is this. Are we indeed in an 8-Year Time Warp, complete with the jumps to the left, steps to the right, pelvic thrusts and the like?

I’d say the answer is yes, albeit with some caveats. And if so, from my controversial perspective, we could do a good deal worse than how we fared during the ensuing four years (until, that is, them covid buggers showed up and took over the joint).

There are many out there who are no doubt horrified by this sentiment, hating the guy barreling into the Oval Office and throwing major shade at those who put him there.

But to paraphrase Frank’s response to Janet when he asked her to rate his creation, they didn’t make him for you.

In partial spoiler space, I will inform my readers that things didn’t work out too well for Frank. Or Rocky. Or, presumably, for Brad and Janet.

But somewhere across this great land, some dark theater is running a midnight showing this magnificent film. And the audience is screaming “asshole” at Brad and “slut” at Janet. And throwing toast at the screen. They’re jumping to the left, stepping to the right, placing their hands on their hips and thrusting their pelvic bones. And, I hope, thoroughly enjoying themselves in so doing.

I’m not here to tell you what to do, but if you did decide to join them, answering the call of our title song and doing the time warp again, you have, from a risk management and aesthetic perspective, my unmixed blessing.

TIMSHEL

All Will Be Well When the Day Is Done(?)

And if you take my hand my son, all will be well when the day is done

Peter Yarrow

Reporter: How do you find America?
John Lennon: Turn Left at Greenland

I am finally getting around to writing about Greenland. As some of you may recall, my attention was turned away from this topic by the late-breaking news that the Morrison Hotel had burned down. I thought, of course, this was a one-off, but now the entire region is in flames. More about that below.

Also, before we turn our attentions to that big icy mass North and East of our natural borders, duty impels me to say a word about Peter Yarrow, left-most name in the eponymous trio of Peter, Paul and Mary, who left us, at the gratifying age of 86, last week.

I was never a huge PPM fan, believing that the best that can be said of them (apart from the Mary Travers smoke show) was that they were right in the middle of it – contributing little but indisputably joining in. If the American popular music scene of the 1960s used protocols established by the American Youth Soccer Association, the trio would’ve undoubtedly earned, and received, a Participation Trophy.

Mostly, they made hits out of other peoples’ songs. They did have a couple of nice original moments, including Noel (Paul) Stookey’s “The Wedding Song (There is Love)”. Also, of course, there’s “Puff the Magic Dragon”, a wistful ode to what we leave behind as childhood turns to maturity. This is required listening for everyone up to the age of ten, and is perhaps more timely now then ever, because, while Peter’s Puff frolicked in the autumn mist, his latter-day namesake spent his time in alleged serial sex abuse and is now cooling his heels in the New York City Metropolitan Detention Center, awaiting a trial that is likely to send him, not sadly into his cave, but into the State Penitentiary for life.

Then of course there’s our title song, which, indeed, is worth a listen. Or two.

We can also bid farewell to a couple of other names from the past: Anita Bryant, the Florida Orange Juice hawking homophobe/recording artist. Down the road in Coral Gables, Sam Moore, who with fellow Floridian Dave Prater formed the pleasing soul Duo Sam and Dave, similarly gathered to the dust of his forbears.

There’s not much to say about this other than the obvious reality that it was a tough week for geriatric crooners hailing from the Sunshine State.

And now let’s put on our cold weather gear and head to Greenland, where we begin with the above- supplied snippet from a John Lennon interview immortalized in the 1964 film “A Hard Day’s Night”. Yes, if one is departing Heathrow on one’s way to JFK, one’s jet heads due Northwest and then indeed turns left (Southwest) in the General vicinity of that big icy island.

I have always been a paranoid about Greenland. So big. So Cold. So Wild. A few folks living in primitive villages on the Southeast Coast and the rest of that enormous territory a wilderness, with the only creatures subsisting there being Darwinian marvels who can freeze and starve with biological impunity.

I am not proud of this, but I have a recurring dream of being stranded in the dead center of this gargantuan land mass.

I imagine I’d be hungry. And cold. Unable to call out for help because, from what I am told, the cell phone service there sucks.

And finally, it would make you cry to learn what passes for a bagel in them parts.

But Trump wants it. Along with Canada and the Canal. His left turns thus continue — from the Greenlandic (yes, Greenlandic) capital of Nuuk to Ottawa. And from there, he turns left again, due South, and traverses the 2,189 Nautical Miles — to the canal we financed, built, ran, and then gifted away under the regime of the (recently departed) Jimmy Carter.

I have read the arguments in favor of these moves (well, except the Canada one, which is flat out ridiculous). Greenland is full of Rare Earth Metals, of which we are in chronic short supply. From there, our armies can incrementally menace Russia, China, North Korea and maybe even Iran. It would, moreover, be a perfect opportunity to stick it to the Danes, which currently protect it. And, let me ask you: what have the Danes done for us lately? Or ever?

The Canal is obviously strategic, else why did we build it in the first place (other than to create perhaps the world’s most famous palindrome: a man a plan a canal panama)?

But, Oh My Heavens! Doesn’t the President Elect have more important matters with which to attend? He’s taking The Oath next week, and, meantime, his predecessor is doing all in his power to block and/or reverse his election-winning policy agenda. Borrowing costs are rising dramatically and presumably in direct contravention of the objectives associated with the full 1% reduction of bank overnight rates effected by the Fed in 2024. Two nasty wars continue to rage.

The November “Republican Sweep’ ushers in a government united across its two elected branches, but one that features a House Margin of (depending upon how you count it) 1 to 2 seats.

The Morrison Hotel is gone and much of the surrounding area continues to either burn or smolder.

It would seem, considering these and other annoyances, that there are better ways to spend the fortnight before one’s swearing in to the Highest Office in the Land than to pump out sideshow spiel of expansive geographic influence.

And nothing for nothing, but the markets are beginning to show their displeasure. As the ball dropped last week, all the ingredients were in place for a renewed, re-energized rally. Instead, after seven sessions, our indices are trading down on the year.

There was a strong Jobs Report, which investors, as they do from time to time, took this as a negative. The inferences they drew as to a more conservative Fed Policy are certainly well-founded. Though memory fades, I recall that All God’s Rate Predictin’ Children were prognosticating a number and timetable for reductions that was nothing short of fantasy based. They were wrong. Cuts came, but later and in smaller magnitude than was gleefully prophesied.

And while market economists are busy factoring higher rates into their models, I suspect that they are still shading towards the Pollyannish. The Fed may not cut at all this year, and, if Inflation perks up, may instead do some raising.

I’m with them on this one. As I’ve stated many times, I don’t endorse Fed rate relaxation as a means of tweaking the capital economy. Instead, I believe that the Central Bank should hack away, not when it can, but rather when it must. Because, when the latter contingency emerges (e.g. during a recession), it’s a stone-cold bummer if they’ve already blown their load.

And the above-mentioned Capital Economy simply does not need thos largesse. In addition to there being scant justification for the bestowal of these gifts, I must point out yet again that the most recent rounds of slashing have done nothing useful at the short end of the curve and have arguably catalyzed the higher yields observed at the long end (that is, where everybody actually borrows).

But this much I promise you – the prices one currently encounters for risk assets are entirely transitory; they will diverge materially ere, say, St. Patrick’s Day arrives. Maybe sooner. There’s a passel of economic data about to drop – including the two big Inflation measures and Retail Sales just this week alone. A lofty expectations earnings season will then commence. Trump will take office and there will be a full-court sprint to pass a budget (featuring an extension of the 2017 Tax Cuts AND a Debt Ceiling increase), through the slightly shady protocols of Reconciliation, immediately thereafter.

I suspect that Big Daddy will immediately seek a deal with his Opposite Number Putin, wherein the latter will cop some Ukrainian Real Estate, but, in consideration of same, will turn its tanks back to the homeland. I think he’ll make good on his threats to turn up the raging fires in the Middle East.

All of which WILL move markets. I continue to believe that the tailwinds are stronger than those blowing in our face, as demonstrated in SoCal, winds of any kind are dangerous, and nobody in a position to do something about it appears keen to make me look good respecting my recent bull prognostications .

Still and all, if I were you, I’d hold on to at least my core positions, with an expectation that doing so will be accretive to your early innings ’25 returns. An accretive set of pre-conditions are indeed in place, and, more likely than not, should take hold.

But, on the other hand, a good deal can go wrong. And I can’t think of any buzz killing scenario more likely than Papa Bear converting his current bluster into action. Cogent arguments are afloat that his rhetoric is merely a negotiating position. He is wielding the threat of heavy tariffs as a rhetorical tool to get the best deals he can.

But 100% levies on Denmark if they don’t cough up Greenland FFS? Denmark is not in the Top 20 U.S. exporters; their ~$11B of sales to us is about 2% of what we purchase from China and Mexico, and >0.1% of the aggregate amount of shit we buy from other countries.

Including Canada. From which we purchase $430B of said shit. Their entire GDP is a shade over $2T, an amount barely more than half of pre-fire California.

So, yes, we can saber rattle with all these countries. Greenland, Denmark, Panama, Canada, China, Mexico – even California. But where will that leave us when day is done?

I’d ask Peter Yarrow, but….

TIMSHEL

The Not Bad, The Bad and The Ugly

He who double crosses Tuco and leaves him alive understands nothing of Tuco

From “The Good, The Bad and The Ugly”

I have chosen, to kick off ’25, to dig deep into my bag of tricks – to perhaps the quintessential Spaghetti Western – Sergio Leone’s the 1966 classic: “The Good, The Bad and the Ugly”. It is a sprawling epic with a wandering plot, but in addition to Clint Eastwood’s career launching performance, it also features perhaps the coolest film score in a decade of great film scores, AND the irrepressible Eli Wallach – a Brooklyn-born Jew who absolutely crushes it as Tuco, the Mexican Bandito, who, among many other things, utters our titular phrase.

Tuco is indisputably The Ugly in the film, and he wears it well. “Blondie” Eastwood is The Good. Lee “Angel Eyes” Van Cleef The Bad. Wallach, arguably though, steals the show.

The universe is replete with essays that utilize the G/B/U motif, and I thus felt more comfortable diverging nominally from the construct. But it’s not as though there’s NO good going on out there, and I’d be remiss if I didn’t begin on this happier note.

To my way of thinking, the best thing that’s happened thus far this year transpired on Friday, when the razor-thin-majority House Republican Caucus, with only minimal petulance, managed to re-appoint Speaker Mike Johnson to this important post, the occupant of which, among other formal duties, stands next in line after Vancey Boy if 47 somehow turns tits up and a new White House occupant is required.

Not gonna lie – I really like this guy. He’s kinda nerdy looking, yes, but so articulate, and a demonstrated compromiser to boot. I was pretty certain that the wing nuts in his crew would block this — reminding us yet again of their inability to come together and actually govern. But they proved me wrong.

Market participants should view this as unmixed good news, as there’s much riding on, say, their ability to extend the 2017 tax cuts – a challenge the outcome of which would’ve been very much in doubt had they chosen to spend the next several weeks squabbling over who gonna sit over Papa Bear’s left shoulder this March, when he delivers his State of the Union Address.

I’m also pleased that the courts threw out that nonsensical Net Neutrality regulation, under which, as a matter of law, ALL users of ethereal bandwidth must pay the same rates. In time-honored fashion, this was nothing but a sop to favored constituents disguised as exactly the opposite – a righteous leveling of the playing field for the little guy. But as matters now stand, huge revenue generating enterprises – ranging from Netflix to the Crypto Bros to the AI pioneers are hoovering up all bandwidth (a finite resource) – to the detriment of us normal schmucks. And the only hope that exists for us is to remove price controls/government intervention and allow market forces to set pricing.

And even The Bad ain’t that bad. Two items come to mind. First, a pox on whoever took a surreptitious image of my liver and then cajoled The Surgeon General to demand the placement of cancer warnings on the nation’s strong waters. In fact, I’m pretty sure they used an MRI image of this organ in the accompanying press release; might force distillers to display my innards on the newly mandated warning labels. If so, my risk management advice is to look away, yes, but drink up.

I also read with some disappointment that the British Crown has removed the Royal Seal designation (first dispensed by Queen Victoria in 1854) from Cadbury Chocolates, which I love. Not sure how much it hurts the enterprise, but I have a cousin that used to work for its Parent Company, and I would always needle him to bring me a sample of the primo shit produced by his firm. His invariable response:

“Cadbury is our premium brand”. To which I would always reply “No, David, I’m talking about the stuff in the vault, that they serve at Board meetings and one bite makes you see God’.

I think all I did was to confuse him.

Indisputably Ugly are the rash of domestic terrorist attacks, the most prominent of which transpired on New Year’s Eve — in the French Quarter, FFS! The gnarly looking perp was taken out at the scene, and now, as ever, we look for answers.

But it was Ugly – so prominently Ugly that it removed that fetching devil Luigi right out of the headlines.

And, in terms of the markets, it’s been a mixed bag – some Cadbury, but also some of those horrible jelly- filled confections. We got a dose of the latter when the trading year commenced on Thursday but managed to gather ourselves and gin up some recapture by the close of the truncated week’s proceedings.

Funds are flowing, but thus far in indiscernible ways. Banks, perhaps aspiringly seeking more lucrative uses for this liquidity, put a huge dent in Fed Reserves:


Contemporaneously, investors withdrew lots of cash from these depository institutions and dumped it into Money Market Funds:


I don’t think we can read to much into any of this.

Meantime, investors, having turned ignominious tail since approximately mid-December, are entering this year’s proceedings with a healthy dose of reticence:


And I say good on them. There’s Good, Bad and Ugly, out there and in these early innings of the contest, we know not which will prevail.

Regular readers (at any rate those who consume the full measure of its content) are aware that I am encouraged by the landscape. There are trillions of dollars of cash to be deployed. Whatever one’s politics, the regime change should be an inexorable improvement for the prospects of the capital economy, relative to the status quo.

So, maybe Thursday’s close will prove to have been a near term bottom; maybe not. But I strongly believe that wherever we find said base, there is a significant climb from these depths that awaits us. After which, as is our fate, these hypotheses will yet again be tested.

Meantime, there’s gold in them thar hills. As there was in The Good, The Bad and The Ugly when the script finally migrates to its main plotline. It will take energy and wiles to find it, just as it did in the film. Without revealing too much, find it they do. But in doing so, Bad Angel Eyes is left dead, Good Blondie rides off with his half, and the final member of the trio – Ugly Tuco — finds himself with the shiny yellow stuff within his reach, but outside of his grasp.

He is double crossed and left alive, presumably with a major score to settle. And we can take two risk management lessons from this. First, as investors, that we may indeed find the filthy lucre but grabbing it and banking it is another matter.

Also, and as importantly, I caution you to beware of Tuco. He’s still out there, uglier than ever, and he has not forgotten.

TIMSHEL

Road Hotel Blues

There’s blood in the streets, it’s up to my ankles,
Blood in the streets, it’s up to my thighs

Jim Morrison

I had a different theme in mind for this last note of 2024: specifically, Greenland, which Trump (like Truman and Andrew Johnson unsuccessfully before him) is seeking to purchase from the Danes. I have always been a little hung up about Greenland, but I reckon this topic must wait for another day.

Because, scanning the wires on this ‘tween holiday weekend, I encountered some shocking news. The Morrison Hotel on South Hope Street in Downtown Los Angeles has burnt to the ground.

The establishment once gave title and inspiration to an eponymous album by The Doors, their penultimate effort, released to mixed reviews, in 1970. Its front window is featured on the cover, and now it’s in ashes, as illustrated with the following “before and after” imagery.


Looks like a total blowout, but you never know. The album, meantime, remains among the treasures of American musical cannon in general and of The Doors catalogue in particular. It’s not their best; that distinction belongs to the flawless L.A. Woman, released in’71 a couple of months before Jim’s death — as impeccable a final statement from an historic artistic genius as any of which I am aware. I remember, around 1980, trying to copy the vinyl version onto a cassette, and finding an insufficiency of capacity on the latter, giving up because I couldn’t bear to part with a single note.

In the intervening decades, history has been kinder to Morrison Hotel, and appropriately so. After dropping 3 or 4 mind-blowing records, the Band got a little weird with their next release – The Soft Parade – with its jazzy instrumentation and rambling titular score. Even this is a pretty good album, but not up to the standards of the legacy created by the group.

Morrison Hotel informed the world that The Doors were back. Spies in the house of love, lamenting up- to-the-ankles/thighs blood in the streets.

And we paid notice. Me and my boys were so taken by Jim’s mystique that upon seeing the following image on Morrison Hotel’s inside jacket, we all took to drinking Bud longnecks.


But after LA Woman, and little more than beyond the release of Morrison Hotel, the music was over. Jim died. The band tried to carry on, but to little avail.

The Morrison Hotel became a tourist attraction and then, over the last few years, as a home for undocumented foreign nationals. Perhaps it self-combusted, in solidarity with those who are in favor of the taxpayer-funded support of these unfortunates. Or in solidarity with those who are against this policy.

Meantime, another year has flown. And one would believe, from a market perspective at any rate, that we’d end the proceedings on a high note. But one would be wrong on that score. All God’s Children are shedding risk, selling stocks, Treasuries (Ten Year yields are at a proximate twenty year high, and Corporates are on full-on offer). Heck, even the magnificent BTC, rising a mere fortnight ago to a respectable 106 handle, is now resident at a shameful, undignified 94 and change.

And this with no FTX-type bankruptcy to contemplate.

Today and tomorrow’s sessions may bail out this buzz kill wind up, but I have my disappointed doubts. Risk taking, for the time at any rate, is on the wane. Perhaps this is due to all that uncertainty out there.

The new Congress takes hold on the unfortunate date of January 6th; you know who arrives two weeks hence. The House is facing the near certainty of another farcical Speaker election. The Republicans hold a 1-2 seat majority, and I’d be shocked if the current occupant of that position can muster the votes on the early ballots to hold his place. I think this is a real shame, because he is certainly well-spoken, appears to be civilized and reasonable. But I think they’re gonna shoot him, as the first round of the same type of circular firing squad that claimed the hides of Paul Ryan and Kevin McCarthy.

The blogosphere, which can always be counted upon to manufacture outrageous content, has floated the improbable name of Elon Musk as a candidate, dismissing, in doing so, the inconvenient reality that by logic at any rate, the Speaker of the House should be a member of the House. I hope, for Elon’s sake, that this notion withers. I think, for all the soaring heights he’s reached, his assumption of this exalted position would render him regretful he ever rose to world domination, and maybe even sorry he was ever born.

Across town, the Fed rotates out four existing, and rotates in four new FOMC voting members, with the latter group featuring the perfidious Austin Goolsbee, erstwhile architect of the Obama economic program, but who, as a tenured professor at the University of Chicago, ought to have known better.

I don’t think it will matter much, though. The Fed is fairly easy to read these days, and when the consensus emerges, as it has, that it will slow its rate-cutting ways, I think it is to be counted upon. The economy ought, as referenced last week, to be able to sustain itself with these still relatively benign financial conditions.

All remains to be seen. I think we begin the year with risk tailwinds, but in time-honored fashion, I advise my clients to take it slow entering ’25. There is a school of thought, to which I don’t subscribe, that urges investors to think of calendar rollovers as mere human device; that nothing changes between, say, Dec 31st and Jan 1st other than that which is simply a biproduct of societal protocol. Under this mindset, nobody should change their investment thinking or strategy as this Tuesday fades into Wednesday.

I take the other side of this argument, believing that, come Wednesday, it’s a whole new ballgame. Investment fund performance becomes a matter of record, and the grueling process of the new track begins. Parameters for compensation across all forms of variable payout (including, importantly, corporate executive compensation) are etched in granite.

It becomes time to roll the rock up the hill again.

On a more touchy-feely level, I think each year tells its own story, and the early portion can be viewed largely as introductory chapters. Yes, they can and often do set the tone, but often with many unforeseen bumps in the road likely to emerge as the calendar unfolds.

This coming year should be no different. Lots of changes, as indicated above, are on the horizon. There are two wars to settle (or not). There are taxes to lower, regulations to crush, oil to pump and tariffs to impose. We may annex Canada, co-opt Panama and yes, purchase Greenland.

Markets may fall, but if so, they will rise again. Just like we anticipated when we over-interpreted the lyrics of L.A. Woman’s title song, particularly the Mr. Mojo Risin (an anagram for Jim Morrison) refrain.

We all hoped that one fine day we’d find him bouncing into town, and taking a look around him to see which way the wind was blowing. Perhaps he’d check into The Morrison Hotel and find cause to bark out some blues respecting his demise.

He never did return. And now The Morrison Hotel is a pile of rubble and ash.

The risk management message here, is clear. The landscape changes. In unexpected ways. At unanticipated times. It behooves us all to remain mindful of this, and to resist temptation to place full reliance on what we see before our eyes.

So, in closing, I wish everyone a Happy New Year, and urge y’all to keep your eyes on the road, and yes, your hands upon the wheel.

TIMSHEL

Delay and Denial

These are variants to the words written on Luigi’s shell casings, but I’m not here to write about Luigi. He is, like the assassins of Archduke Franz Ferdinand (an event which launched the First World War), simply a manifestation of a larger problem, which, if left unchecked, could turn into a catastrophe.

Meantime, approaching holiday notwithstanding, I’ve got some beefs with y’all that may require a sit down to settle. However, in deference to the season, and seeing as how it’s one of those rare instances where Christmas and Chanukah (the latter beginning at sundown on Wednesday) coincide (approximately once every 20 years), I figure I might as not begin with something more uplifting.

110 years ago, across the WW1 Battle Fields of Flanders, the minor miracle of a spontaneous Christmas Truce broke out. The “war to end all wars” was entering its 6th month. All combatant nations (save the United States) were engaged, and a multi-year interval of trench warfare – under which the opposing armies were dug in at close range, lobbing missiles and mustard gas at one another, but with little or new ground ever gained or yielded, had begun.

But it was Christmas, and, seemingly without any premeditation, on those soon-to-be-blood-soaked fields, caroling broke out on both sides. Men on both sides converged to harmonize, share holiday provisions, and celebrate, together, the yuletide. Including, notably, in Ypres, which featured in subsequent years a total 5 battles, and several hundred thousand war-related casualties.

The bloody action was thus delayed. For 24 hours. By Boxing Day 1914, it was on again. Tens of millions would die in The Great War. Russia would quit, mid-game, to overthrow the tsar, which should’ve sealed the win for Germany, but that the was precise juncture when the Yanks entered the fray, with a seemingly unending supply of troops, weapons and munitions. This forced Germany into the singular position of suing for peace with the bulk of its armies still holding enemy territory. Very little having been settled. Twenty odd years later, the world felt compelled to do it all again. On a bigger scale. But at least that contest resolved matters – for a time.

Meantime, Christmas 1914 was, to the best of my knowledge, the only time in modern military history that enemy armies paused in their hostilities in homage to something larger, and this is worth remembering.

And there’s something about the current global vibe that is naggingly reminiscent of the unfolding of WW1. Everyone’s edgy. Random assassins and other menaces crop up without notice. The geopolitical construct is one under which an endlessly complicated set of alliances renders it difficult to determine which nations are allied and which are in opposition. A false step, I fear, could set the world ablaze. Just like it did in 1914.

But that’s not my beef; here’s my beef. What on earth was all this recent selling about? Our equity indices have been sucking ass for the last fortnight, only recovering modestly on Friday – ostensibly because an Inflation measure favored by the pointy-headed came in 0.1% below expectations of 2.4% (does anyone really care?). Prior to that, we had a very visible but not particularly pleasant correction under way.

The raw numbers fail to reflect either my disappointment or the performance carnage. Col. Naz (now in danger of being busted back down into the ranks) dropped 5%, but the Gallant 500 only yielded an amount about half of this previously captured ground.

But I have a problem here. First, because I told everyone that I didn’t see any signs of a year-end selloff and I don’t like being made a monkey of. But perhaps even more importantly, because y’all were supposed to be buying, locking in a year of > 25% gains and ensuring a fat payday for one and all.

And what more did you want to do what was asked of you? Inflation is parameterized. Q4 growth is projected at > 3%. There’s a new regime coming to town, bearing with them the promise of all sorts of bennies. Tax cuts. Liberation of the Energy Sector. A non-hostile SEC. A veritable orgy of deregulation. A Federal Trade Commission with an agenda other than killing every deal contemplated. Musk and that hedge fund dude riding into town to remove the snouts of the pigs from the fiscal trough.

OK, so there’s some UFOs flying over New Jersey, but if we’re gonna turn tail at every sketchy, shady development over ‘cross the river, we’re never gonna get anywhere.

The Headline news/designated catalyst for the puke was Wednesday’s FOMC meeting, wherein they followed through on their promise to cut 25, but also revealed a dot plot which foretold of (gasp) only two rate reductions next year:

I have a little difficulty reading this and therefore must rely upon the more erudite to translate it into a 2-cut prognostication.

But I reckon dots are gonna dot. And plot. What I can’t figure out is why this was considered sufficiently morose to catalyze a huge rout on Wednesday afternoon.

Yes, they tried to rally ‘em back on Thursday, but to little avail; the benchmarks closed flat that day. So, it took that whopper 0.1% Inflation beat to put sugar into investor tanks.

 

I will strive not to take this personally, but perhaps in vain. Because, I have this conceit that the Fed should avoid cutting rates unless conditions compel it to do so, as it dilutes the juice that the Central Bank can apply when such actions are truly warranted. I am thus wondering why even 2 more reductions are considered not only necessary, but insufficient.

And, as illustrated in the following chart of Fed rates, it is not as though, by historical standards in any event, monetary conditions are particularly tight:


It appears, from my vantage point, like we’re in a highly appropriate rate range here. The economy looks at worst stable and arguably strong. As indicated above, the promises made by the new President and Congress should create something of a tailwind heading into 2025.

And, throwing up my hands, I believe that if this economy cannot abide the current overnight rate of ~4.6%, and investors are baring their teeth at a move into the high 3s, then we have all misread the signals and must prepare for some economic hardships which I, quite frankly, do not see on the horizon.

The government avoided shutdown with another one of its infinite sequences of Continuing Resolutions, and the cynic inside me is tempted to proclaim the sustained funding of Washingtonian escapades to be a dilutive development. But admittedly, that would be mere bluster on my part. In particular, we should keep underwriting the Army, because we may need it sooner than we think.

For reasons that should thus be apparent, I have suggested to my clients that current valuation thresholds may very well be productive entry points. I’m not predicting a year-end recapture of all lost ground (we’ve only about 5 productive trading sessions remaining to us in this year), and we may even enter ‘25 proceedings a bit wobbly. But I’m fairly convinced that by Valentine’s Day at the latest, the markets will have ginned up a rally that it will have been a shame to have missed.

After that, who knows? I think the Capital Economy, as enabled and abetted by favorable Tax and Regulatory policies, a robust deal calendar, lower energy prices, etc. should be poised for incremental growth. And, for the bajillionth time, I remind my readers that the supply/demand conditions for investible assets point to a shortage that should further goose valuations.

Investors appear to be in denial about this, and it would be unwise to underestimate the ability of the knuckleheads in Washington, including those from the new (old) regime to bitch things up. Those machines hovering over Monmouth County, moreover, may be hostile operators, and wreak absolute havoc on us.

These risks, however, are no different from those we have faced since the first bi-peds began swapping rocks for women, land and other commodities.

And besides, it’s Christmas. And Chanukah. And I wish Peace and Prosperity to one and all. And, in closing, while undertaking whatever version of the seasonal rituals that best apply, I urge everyone to give one remembrance to those poor, brave souls in Western Belgium, circa 1914, who, first offering praise and thanks to their Creator and breaking bread with their enemies, gave up life, limb and treasure to establish a world order suitable to us all.

They failed, of course. And we will fail again. We always do. But then we get up.

And give it another shot.

Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, and, as always….

TIMSHEL

Heal Ourselves

With all matters ’24 winding down and little of import scheduled on the tape (OK; we got FOMC this week, but I can’t work up much enthusiasm about it), I will attempt to school y’all as to what is really wrong with our Health Care System. This in the wake of that poor son of a bitch getting plugged during morning Midtown rush hour, and even more so the rise legions of misinformed souls who, with varying levels of irrationality, are applauding at least the intent, if not the consequence, of his action.

I take this whole thing somewhat personally for a couple of reasons. First, the murder happened on my turf. I have walked by that very spot thousands of times. I have occupied a half dozen offices – including my current one, within a couple of blocks of the crime scene. I park in the adjacent hotel garage regularly. For 10 years, I owned a Condo less than half a mile away.

The topic also touches me professionally, first because I have also spent many years working on projects, albeit with minimal success, designed to bring incremental rationality to health care costs. Moreover, I am, like > 50 million other Americans, a customer of United Health Care, paying for not only my own family’s coverage, but also that of my employees. They have been, upon occasion, maddening to deal with, and have outright pissed me off more than once.

But they are not the head of the dragon, nor, perhaps, even its tail.

But before I get to that, it is my pleasure to celebrate the following chart with you, which touches my soul almost as much as the image of the refurbished Notre Dame Cathedral I shared in last week’s note:

To what, for the uninitiated, I am referring is the essential end of a multi-year condition known as an Inverted Yield Curve, under which rates for shorter duration debt exceed those of longer maturities. And that ain’t natural. If you borrow a few bucks from a buddy and promise to pay him tomorrow, you’d expect to pay a lower vig than you would if your agreement called for you to cover this loan in, say, 2027.

The Economics books tell you that an Inverted Yield Curve is a recessionary indicator, but I don’t think this is what’s been at play here. I think that the Treasury Market has been, since lockdowns at least, distorted by both Monetary and Fiscal Policy, and that a return to normalcy is a boon to rational capital allocation.

But back to UNH. Their projected 2024 profit is ~$23B – hardly chump change. But measured against the above-mentioned 50 million system users, and considering they have business lines other than insurance, their profit per patient < $500/year. Moreover, with a market cap that hovered before this Luigi dude gunned down their CEO at ~$500B (it is by this measure the 16th largest company in the world), the return to investors, owners of this business, is ~4.6% — again not chump change but less than the yield on 2-year Treasuries that prevailed before the Fed began cutting rates.

I sympathize with those who, having treatment coverage denied or delayed, have formed a rage against the insurance company itself, but their anger is misplaced. It is the system, not its custodians, that causes most of the problems.

Allow me to elaborate. First, and most broadly, the vital economic ecosystem known as Health Care is the most structurally distorted of any which I am aware. As an unavoidable reality, Supply AND Demand are set by the supplier. You don’t walk into a doctor’s office or a hospital and inform them of your preferences, they inform you of your needs. There’s nothing anybody can do about this. They also control the oversight mechanisms, but more about that below.

Further economic distortions emerged after WWII, when, facing a labor shortage, American Industry began to offer Health Care as part of compensation packages. Among other matters, there’s a tax arb here; for most of us, the dollars paid for health care coverage are worth as much as direct compensation –are perhaps even more valuable because they are received without a tax liability. Employers cover these costs and deduct the payments from their taxable income. In this way, trillions of dollars transferred across the economy escape the avaricious clutches of the tax man.

These two elements of Health Care economics have created incentives for overconsumption, as we all tend to gorge ourselves on any product or service for which somebody else is footing the bill. It is also at this point when Health Insurance became a misnomer. In other forms of insurance, we pay a premium to cover the adverse impacts of an unfortunate contingency. But with Health Insurance, nearly all economic burdens are underwritten by the insurer.

There are also misapprehensions as to who is covering these costs. Large corporations ALL underwrite their own risks in these realms and use companies such as UNH simply to merely push the paper around. When coverage for 40% of our fellow citizens paid for by taxpayers, most notably through programs such as Medicare and Medicaid are added in (the National Institute of Health estimates that 2/3rds of 2024 medical costs were paid by the government), the percentage of the costs of medicines, treatment and the like that are paid by insurance companies themselves drops to the low double digits (or below). Yes, it is your UNH rep that informs you that they won’t cover your hip replacement, but more often than not, they’re simply following guidelines of third-party underwriters.

This is not to suggest that insurance companies don’t play games to goose profits. They most certainly do. It’s the American Way.

We can also blame lawyers, who have boosted liabilities (contingent and actual) into the stratosphere. But I have some sympathy here, because, whatever else happens, lawyers gotta get paid.

There are, in addition, a few other distorting dynamics. First, particularly in this environment of accelerated technological development, many tasks that doctors perform (and for which they charge doctor-level fees) could, with greater ease, lower cost, and perhaps greater efficiency, be undertaken by machines and Health Care personnel without medical degrees. This would liberate physicians to apply their time and efforts to maximum treatment benefit, but I am not optimistic that any change in that direction will be speedy in its rendering. Doctors are like everyone else, insofar as that they don’t like giving up revenue streams. So, they continue to apply stethoscopes, blood pressure monitors and thermometers to our bodies every day, and this drives up costs and reduces treatment availability as well.

The American Medical Association lords over these matters, and one upsets them at one’s own hazard.

Perhaps the most difficult inefficiency to address is the disproportionate skew of Health Care expenditures for a given individual towards treatments taking place at the end of that person’s life. That infallible source – NIH – estimates that the percent of outlays in the last 12 months of an average person’s life is between 10% and 12%. This may not sound exorbitant, but if one recalls that human life spans are now approaching 80 years, it is 10x the amount expended in earlier years of our mortal existence.

The last days of my daddy – that old mixer Stuart Charles Grant, who I don’t believe darkened a doctor’s door for six or so decades, but who in in the last several months of his life spent more time inside medical facilities than out, is an anecdotal example.

And it did no good. He died anyway — I suspect within the same timeframes as would have prevailed if he had chosen to stay home. On the night of her death, they airlifted my mother from a suburban Chicago hospital to Northwestern Memorial, where, upon doctor’s advice, I authorized the same fatal morphine dose that she easily could’ve received without leaving her Lake Forrest deathbed.

We all have stories like these…

There are other issues as well, of course. At the lower end of the socioeconomic spectrum, we encounter untold instances under which all medical services begin in the Emergency Room and extend into the priciest realms of Health Care.

But in general, we have a system under which the supplier sets the demand levels and associated price, where consumers pay for only a small fraction of the products and services consumed, thereby incentivizing overconsumption and disincentivizing price disclipline, where doctors rule and lawyers run wild.

And an efficient mix between costs and competent treatment? Fuggedaboudit.

For anyone who cares to know, our projects involved creating a capital and trading market to swap expense streams for various diseases – most notably diabetes, the treatment of which we spend more than we do on Crude Oil. In our imagined Utopia, markets would set the price of care, based upon those righteous forces that govern other marketized elements of the economy. It could work, but our failed experiences suggest that the idea, best case, is ahead of its time.

The problems, meantime, appear to be intractable, but I think an honest rendering would suggest that we obtain better outcomes than those jurisdictions that feature universal Health Care. You may prefer the latter, but you may want to check with your friends in the U.K. to determine their wait times and experience quality for even the most basic and essential elements of their medical treatments. And please bear in mind that nothing’s for free, and that you’ll pay one way or another. Finally, with our government covering 67% of Health Care costs, we’re closer to socialized medicine than you may imagine.

I’m even more certain that plugging several holes into the back of an insurance CEO is, at best counterproductive and, at worst, catastrophic. We can choose to gaze into those dewy brown eyes and proclaim the hitman a visionary martyr. I don’t, however, feel it will accomplish much and may cause serious incremental carnage.

In the final analysis, like the physician referenced in Luke (4:23), we must seek to heal ourselves. Our problems are chronic and solutions elusive. But let’s at least start with a proper diagnosis, and then work diligently towards constructive, rather than damaging, murderous ends.

TIMSHEL