Free Rising

Financial Types, Risk Takers, Classic Rockers, lend me your eyes. I come to bury Petty, not to praise him. For the good in men’s catalogues bombards our playlists, while their drek is oft interred with their bones. So let it be with Petty….

And that’s about as far as I can go to mash up Willy Shake and TP.

I noted Petty’s passing with mixed emotions. Of course, it was sad that he died – for the heartbroken Heartbreakers, his family and his fans. I will also give him his props for his visceral understanding of the difficult-to-define-but-unmistakable-when-you-encounter-it rock idiom, and for doing his best to pay it forward.

But, perhaps (nay, almost certainly) unfairly, I hold him accountable for rising higher in the rock pantheon than I believe he earned. Some of this is quite personal, so bear with me if you can. For me, the allure of music of all types (and perhaps rock and roll as much as any other genre) begins and ends in the composition phase. I fell into a lifelong state of obsession because of the songs. And, having written a few myself, I have recognized the supreme challenge of achieving success in this regard. To write something original, astonishing, and yet pleasing to the finite vocabulary of the human ear, is akin to being a consistently successful NFL QB. From this perspective, rock exploded to divine altitudes over a brief period between, say the mid-60s and the early 70s. As long as our aural cavities remain useful receptacles, we’ll be rocking to the sublime output of the period, as produced by (yeah, you guessed it) the Beatles, Dylan, the Stones, Hendrix, Janis, the Doors, Zep, Pink Floyd, the Who, the Dead, the Kinks, etc. But that once in many centuries era of discovery ended as quickly as it began. The Beatles broke up in a hissy fit. Jimi, Jim and Janis all inevitably perished. Zep and Floyd had topped out by the mid-70s, and they and the rest of them geniuses (here, of course, I’ll carve out Dylan, but I AM talking to you, MICK) have spent the subsequent decades mailing it in.

Not to worry, proclaimed the musical press. The torch has been passed to a new generation, and they will carry on like never before. The group designated to lead the charge included Springsteen, U2, Bowie, Queen. And Petty. Of these, I believe that only Bowie (and perhaps Queen) lived up to this promise. But Petty, as much as any other performer, grabbed the spotlight. And though it would have been, particularly in retrospect, a ridiculous demand that he or his peers create sonic pleasures on the order of, say, “Blonde on Blonde”, “Abbey Road” or Neil Young’s “After the Goldrush”, they clearly fell short of this standard. After Petty died, I conducted a little mental experiment and came to the conclusion that there aren’t more than one or two songs in his catalogue (“Refugee” comes to mind) he ever recorded that would’ve been good enough to be included in, say, Goldrush alone. I took this personally, because these failures denied me the delights afforded to our older brothers and sisters, whom I envied for the unexcelled pleasure they must’ve experienced when they purchased “Sticky Fingers” on the day of its release, and placed it, for the first time, on the turntable. By the time I got hip to any of this (and I was an undisputed early adopter), all I got was the accessible but deteriorating stylings of “Goats Head Soup”. And it was all downhill from there. We carried on as best we could, but guys like Petty let us down. I’m not done yet. Petty also kind of irritated me because of his elevation to the status of peerage by his
betters, most notably Dylan, Jerry Garcia and especially George Harrison. Oh George, you know in your heavenly heart of hearts that he wasn’t your equal, but you treated him as one. And while he not only benefitted but did the best he could with this gift, he (and by implication, you) he never merited this status.

And now he’s gone, and the world cries its crocodile tears (meanwhile, the death of a better songwriter/guitar player: Steely Dan’s Walter Becker, passed largely unremarked by the world at large). Something tells me we’ll survive the blow. This is the worst I have to say about Mr. Petty, and I beg your forgiveness for having said it. I do wish him a sweet and blissful rest, and will do my penance by using his lyrics (which rarely demanded much thought on the part of his listeners) to set our theme for this week.

We can begin, as Petty might’ve wished, by offering the observation that whatever else can be said about Mr. Market, for the time being at least, it won’t back down. Nay, it continued its heavenward climb, with each of our favorite indices setting four consecutive all-time highs last week. Year-to-date, domestic and indeed global equity benchmarks, while reaching never-before-manifested elevations, are doing so at improbably high Sharpe Ratios of >2.0 and gravity defying Sortinos of ~5.0. At the moment, you can stand them up at the gates of Hell, and they’ll stand their ground; won’t be turned around. Then came Friday morning, and the mixed tidings of the September Jobs Report. Investors had dampened expectations due to the storm drenching experienced in our southern realms, but the number came in below the bottom end of the range: Private Payrolls actually declined by around 40,000 gigs, the first drop in this metric in 7 years. U.S. equity investors did indeed take notice of this, and actually ginned up a decline in the index – to the tune of 0.01% — 1 basis point – on the Dow Jones Industrial Index (the Naz, true to its name, actually closed up). It might be fair to state that thus far the selloff fails to rise to the dignity of either the ’29 or ’87 crashes.

Now, one might surmise that a weaker than weak jobs report might catalyze a bid in the interest rate complex – which, unlike equities – has been under what passes for some pressure of late. But one would be wrong on that score. Govies sold off modestly, adding nearly a big fat basis point to yields on the 10- year note.

The logical inference is that the “risk on” regime continues to dominate the proceedings. And there is some justification for this. While investment markets are nothing if not frothy, this here geriatric economic recovery appears be gathering steam. Other elements of the Jobs Report (Base Unemployment Rate, Average Hourly Earnings) brought tidings of labor market tightness. The Q3 Earnings Reporting cycle begins next week, and in addition to an encouraging sequence of positive pre-announcements, the likelihood is that investors will be in a hurricane-induced forgiving mood in terms of both results and forward guidance.

Here, I hasten to mention that the upcoming CEO recital series is what us ballers like to describe as the Kitchen Sink Quarter. Big shot Biz Executives often use the Third Quarter to throw the wettest blanket they can find on their proclamations, so as to look extra-good in Q4, when their compensation is set. Similarly, with just over 10 weeks left in this improbable year, professional investors are not likely to hazard the negative performance implications of divestiture of key holdings. The confluence of these dynamics leads me to believe that investors will be in a generous mood when they evaluate the words of wisdom issuing forth from corporate podiums across this great nation.

So what will make this market generate the Breakdown that Mr. Petty so plaintively requested? Well, my answer for the moment is: nothing on the visible horizon. If one can turn one’s eyes away from the horrors of Vegas or the hypocritical chicanery of one Mr. Weinstein, there are some fairly menacing but obtuse comments issuing forth from the White House lately. While short on details, they imply assertive action in some remote quarter of the globe – perhaps Iran or North Korea for instance. If so, perhaps investors won’t like what they hear, but I wouldn’t bet the ranch on it.

What I do think may be on the horizon is a more politically sensitized tone to the markets. After having whiffed entirely on Health Care, the Republican Caucus is turning its attention towards the Big Enchilada: Tax Reform. The early returns here look anything but promising. And though this is only my opinion, it appears to me that the chances for passing anything meaningful and/or accretive in this realm are about the equivalent of those tied to Health Care a few months ago.

Further, I feel that Wall Street is the main culprit here. Having for many months ignored or put an unjustifiably positive spin on all data flows, investors are incentivizing political actors to do — exactly nothing. If the current paradigm remains in place, come the holiday season, members of the 114th Congress will return to the welcoming arms of their constituents bearing the gifts of full employment, absence of inflation, and yes, record asset valuations. If anyone thinks that under these circumstances, our timid legislators will come together for any action bearing even a modicum of risk, they should think again.

Conversely, if investors were to band together and actually sell a few stocks, it is my belief that those lovable guys and gals in the Senate and the House would gather themselves in a manner reminiscent of the 73rd Congress, ushered in with the first inauguration of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Within 100 days of convening, they had set the framework for the New Deal, created the Securities Act of 1933 (which still governs investment to this day), established the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and implemented Glass Steagall – a separation of banking from securities business that lasted until the ‘90s, when Sandy Weill found the law inconvenient to his plans to merge Citibank and Salomon Brothers, and convinced his pal Bill Clinton to strike it down.

That kind of presidential loving is hard to find – at least this side of Monica Lewinsky. So whatever else might be said of Sandy, perhaps we can all agree that he got lucky, babe.

But absent any kind of breakdown emanating from Tehran, Pyongyang or (scariest of all) Washington, I expect that the markets will remain in “buy” configuration, and encourage you to act accordingly. Investors aren’t likely to screw up the rest of the year, and it’s anyone’s guess when they belatedly wake up and send appropriate signals to Washington. At that point: a) it may be too late to salvage the market-friendly opportunities afforded by the results of the 2016 election; and b) investors are likely to overreact to the downside when, at long last, this reality hits them.

So, for those looking to capitalize upon such a downward reset, it is my duty to remind you of Mr. Petty’s glib admonition. The current free rising market paradigm cannot last forever, but the waiting is indeed the hardest part. For Tom, the waiting is over, but it did indeed last quite a while. The last time he recorded anything to which anyone paid any attention was 25 years ago. For the rest of us, the waiting continues. Markets continue to defy gravity, and every day we draw one more card.

Let’s play them wisely, shall we?

TIMSHEL

If You Got ‘Em, Smoke Em

Yup, that’s my advice – at least for the time being. If you got ‘em, the time may have come for you to smoke ‘em. I’ll elaborate shortly, but first, a little historical context in order. The origins of the phrase reach back to WWII, as a middle 20th century variation on the command: “At Ease”. During those infrequent intervals when our boys were not forced to contend with the likes of the German, Japanese (and once in a blue moon) Italian armies, their field commanders would suggest that they kick back by issuing the following order:

“Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em”.

Approximately a generation later, the progeny of the Greatest Generation inverted the phrase into the form I have selected for our title, and it took on an entirely different meaning. Suffice to say it was embraced enthusiastically by Baby Boomers as an anthem of sorts. For a time at any rate, they always had them, and, having, they smoked them.

Fast forward to more recent times. In the high flying world where I roll, a Smoke is now vernacular for a Private Jet – perhaps the most unambiguous symbol of elevated status that exists today. If you’ve really hit the big time, you fly your Smoke to places like Davos to discuss global warming. But even one level down, where you mostly use your Smoke to fly you between your bi-coastal residences, and (if the spirit moves) to the Super Bowl, you have scant cause for complaint.

But I do. Have cause for complaint, that is. Because though it pains me to admit it, I do not, at the present time, nor have I ever, owned my own Smoke. And given that the season of atonement is upon us, I may as well disclose that while I’ve ridden on a few Smokes, I’ve never even had routine access to one.

Neither, apparently, had (now former) Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. Until recently, that is. As a stone cold member of the Trump Cabinet, he managed to rack up about a million bucks of travel charges – in less than six months – using transports known among us players as Government Smokes: Smokes that are owned by taxpayers and funded by their dollars. Thus, whatever else one wishes to say about Flying Tom, one cannot accuse him of having ‘em but not smoking ‘em.

It should be noted, however, that Flying Tom was not the first government official to roll like this. Among those that blazed the aeronautical trail before him, at least according to published reports, are Former Attorney General Eric Holder, and current Special Counsel Robert Mueller. Presumably, though, even they weren’t the first to smoke on the pubic pipe. Here, I’m thinking Smoking Joe Biden (who never seems to have two nickels to rub together) and maybe even former Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board William McChesney Martin. Moreover, though they didn’t have Smokes back in his time, one can envision that if they did, T.R.’s Secretary of State Elihu Root might’ve been a likely candidate for this type of flying, five-finger discount.

As for Secretary Price, though, once caught with his fingers in the gravity defying cookie jar, he not only quickly owned up to his sins, but has tried to make amends – by reimbursing the government an amount equivalent to the cost of a single seat on a commercial. But it wasn’t enough. Trump bailed on him in lightening quick fashion, and, by Friday, he was gonzo. The post of HHS Secretary remains open at the point of publication of this column.

I tend to agree with the pundits who have suggested that the President might’ve done more to stand by his man across this episode, but I do find some irony in Mr. Price’s having flown too far on the public dime, using the world’s most elite form of transportation, and then being thrown by the President under the most proletarian of travel modes – the proverbial bus.

But I’m not sure anyone should be laughing here – particularly the members of, and those sympathetic to, the current administration, which just experienced one of the worst weeks in its short history. Big Don backed the wrong horse in the Alabama Republican Senatorial Primary, who may have been better off had the big fella not thrown support his way. In annoyingly trademark fashion, he has waged an unwinnable battle with the players in the NFL, in the process distracting from the entertainment value of what I believe to be the world’s leading form of commercial amusement, and confusing everyone about: a) what the issues are; and b) who’s on which side of the argument. Not content with this, he entered into an even more futile cat fight with the Mayor of storm-savaged San Juan.

He released details of a tax reform plan that must travelled a tortured path indeed if it ever is to be enacted, and, at best, is likely to look entirely different when (if) it comes to his desk for signature. And if it fails, it may seal the status of 115th Congressional session over which he presides (and in which his party holds majorities) as one of the ineptest in history. The 116th may look bear very little resemblance to its predecessor.

The week also brought the latest breakdown in what the mainstream press repeatedly calls the “last gasp” of ObamaCare repeal efforts. And just as this defeat became manifest, he forced out of office the Secretary of the Department that is tasked with the execution of the laws that oversee the concept.

But not much if any of this, appeared to trouble the investor class, which managed to bid up domestic and global stocks to yet another record, in the process closing them at their dead highs – all at the end of the 8,637th consecutive quarter of gains. Meanwhile, the VIX closed at a record low of 9.59, but that hasn’t stopped investors from piling in on the short side of this trade, as short interest for VIX futures continues to set daily records. It perhaps bears further mention that this incremental crushing of index volatility is transpiring at a point in the calendar that typically generates the greatest amount of price dispersion.

Like I say, if you got ‘em, smoke ‘em.

Most other asset classes are showing more bi-directional volatility. The USD has gotten off the schneid a bit, and bonds are selling off across the globe. The bubbling crude had a big week, and the confluence of activity across rates, FX and commodities suggests that somebody out there is expecting some sort of action.

With respect to these and other imponderables, I hasten to remind you that the fascinating year of 2017 is now 3/4ths over (a pessimist might describe it as 1/4th incomplete), but that what type of year it actually turns out to be may well be determined over the next month and a half. Next week is data-light until Friday, when the September Jobs report drops. By all indication, the BLS will be given a statistical mulligan, as last month’s unfortunate storm sequence is expected to dilute the outcome. Shortly thereafter, the earnings reporting cycle begins, and for the first time in a dog’s age, the bar is actually pretty high.

On balance, I continue to like ‘em here. Equities, that is. Maybe Bonds too. I simply believe that the current upward trend will continue until it is impelled by outside forces to reverse course, and I don’t see these forces gathering anywhere – at least for now. Yes, they’re out there, but until we can see the whites of their eyes, well, you know.

In addition to the foregoing, as Q4 unfolds, we’ll bear witness to incremental Washingtonian statesmanship, further developments in the Mueller investigation, perhaps some shenanigans from Pyongyang, and, if we’re lucky, maybe an extension of the fabulous Hillary Clinton “I take full responsibility but everyone else is to blame” Book Tour.

All of this (particularly the last item) indeed makes me want to smoke one, but the plain truth is that I haven’t got one to smoke. Hopefully you do, and if so, I reiterate my belief that now’s the time. If the spirit moves and you get in touch, perhaps I’ll join you. But one way or another, I encourage you NOT to let the opportunity pass you by. It could be quite a spell before another one comes your way.

TIMSHEL

Black Keys Matter

Amid the crescendo of athletes and entertainers heroically using their highly paid platforms to lecture the less informed among us on topics of morality, the time has come for me to join the chorus. As everyone presumably is aware, I’m known throughout the world – primarily for my singularly tasty guitar chops, but the truth is that I occasionally sit down at the keyboard bench, and hope for the best. Here, I face the following problem: I can only play songs in the Key of C. The main reason for this is that on a piano, the C Major scale features all white, and no black key notes. And though I’m not proud of this, I am forced to admit that those pesky black keys throw me off. So when banging away at the 88 finger machine, I tend to stay at home. In the Key of C.

All of this got me to thinking: is the Key of C racist? 

I sure hope not, because (trust me on this) C is an important key – particularly for Rock and Roll. Without it, some really good songs either disappear entirely, or need modification away from their current state of perfection. A small sample of the types of compositions impacted (and likely not for the better) would include (in my judgement) C King Bob Dylan, whose Hard Rain”, “Like a Rolling Stone”, “Just Line a Woman” and “Blowing in the Wind” reside in C-space. In addition, there’s the Stones’ “You Can’t Always Get What You Want”, “Let it Bleed”, “Brown Sugar” and “Can You Hear Me Knockin”. The Beatles use C for (among others) “Across the Universe”, “Let it Be” and “The Continuing Story of Bungalow Bill”. And the list goes on and on. There’s the Allman Brothers’ “Whippin’ Post”, Jerry Jeff Walker’s “Mr. Bojangles”, The Eagles’ “Take it to the Limit”, Bowie’s “Space Oddity”, Blue Suede’s “Hooked on a Feeling”, and of course, Brewer and Shipley’s “One Toke Over the Line”.

I could go on, but presumably you get the idea.

I should also mention that one of my all-time heroes (and no, I don’t care what you think about this): Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, a virtuoso pianist in her own right, once famously said that all music eventually converges back to the Key of C. As a sharecropper’s daughter who rose to great heights, one would have a difficult time accusing her of racism, so for the time being, I think it would be wise to get of the Key of C’s nut.

If we can do this, perhaps in these touchiest of times, we can cut each other some slack on a broader range of subjects. Maybe, for instance, we can stop calling each other nasty, hurt feeling names. But I don’t hold out much hope on that score. Especially with the news flow dominated by two military chieftains derisively calling one another Rocket Man (original song in the Key of G) and a Dotard, respectively. I could even live with this if there weren’t the small matter of nukes being involved. But they are. Involved, that is. Nukes, that is.

In fact, as the clock moves inexorably forward into Autumn, this Trans-Pacific lack of civility is perhaps the biggest risk factor that we as investors face. And it would not be wise to discount it, because, of course, this is serious business.

Deadly serious.

And I’m having a hard time envisioning how the world avoids an unpleasant showdown here. By all appearance, we’re a hair trigger away from a full blown military confrontation, and unless one side backs down (unlikely) that’s where we’re headed – perhaps sooner rather than later.

But presumably, you’d prefer to obtain geopolitical insight from other sources, so suffice to say that from a market perspective, other looming, vexing hazards appear to be on the wane. The government didn’t shut down – yet. The White House appears to be adopting at least a marginally more adult-like demeanor. Two horrible storms hit our southern shores in terrifying sequence, but both storm centers appear to be constructively starting the slow process of rebuilding and recovery. Political unrest appears to be at least marginally on the wane across the globe.

QIII/17 ends this Friday, and shortly thereafter, we’ll be looking at earnings, GDP and other metrics that present themselves at routine 3-month intervals. With respect to the former, it would appear that the perky trends of preceding quarters may continue. As of now, positive pre-announcements are coming in at the fastest pace in, well, in quite a spell.

In fact, they are clocking in at record levels:

In general, I think that the risk environment has improved materially as we enter the 4th Quarter, and I wouldn’t be surprised if some of our favorite markets start on a small tear. Of course, I make this proclamation after a flat week for the SPX, but this bothers me not at all. After spending four full months within the 24 handle, the Gallant 500 is likely to move somewhere, and I don’t think the direction is going to be down.

Some of my thinking derives from a strengthening belief that the global shortage of marketable securities is becoming more acute with each tick of the clock. There are simply too few stocks and bonds available to meet incremental investor demand. If you doubt this, consider the reality that on Wednesday, the FOMC did indeed announce the beginning of its long-anticipated divestiture process. Think of this as a reverse QE. To wit, just as the Quantitative Easing process involves creating new currency to purchase existing securities, so too does Balance Sheet Reduction destroy currency (in the form of Central Bank Reserve reduction) for the purpose of selling existing securities. QE drove rates down dramatically; the announcement of Balance Sheet Reduction drove them up – to the tune of 3 whole basis points!

But life is pretty sweet if you’re a Central Banker these days. You own assets and carry liabilities at rates of your own choosing, so you can do pretty much what you want with impunity. If the spirit moves, you can print new units of your own currency. Perhaps this is why there was such a wild bid on the stock of maybe the Central Bankiest of Central Banks: The Swiss National Bank. It is the only organization of its kind that trades on public markets, it borrows at negative rates, and its stock has doubled this year:

I’d say that even at ~CHF 4,000, the stock is still a buy, but good luck getting your hands on any. There are only 100,000 shares outstanding. Compare this to, say, Fifth Third Bank of Cincinnati, OH, the 15th largest bank holding company in America, which has 736 million shares on the open market.

But as to the broader market, again, all signs now point upward to me, and if it weren’t for the looming Rocket Man/Dotard throw down, I’d say that we might be poised to go on a major ripper.

Yes, stocks are overvalued by many metrics, but absent some paradigm shift (which will have to transpire eventually), they are likely to stay that way for the foreseeable future, and if I’m correct on that score, then there’s no reason they can’t climb considerably higher before the inexorable forces of gravity set in.

I’d also remind you that next week, holiday-impeded by Yom Kippur, may feature a tape painting cycle designed to squeeze out a few extra basis points of performance at the end of a deceptively difficult quarter.

It should be game on after that, and I see good opportunity to put a nice cherry on top of this Soggy Sundae of a year. But not on the short side.

So I’d ask everyone to keep their collective chins up, and if we can be a little nicer to one another, that would be a good thing as well. Let’s start by eradicating the claims of racism against the Key of C Major, which I do not believe discriminates against any racial, ethnic or social cohort. And just to show you how important C Major is, I’ve saved the best for last. The Abbey Road Medley – the last recording ever made by the Fab 4, while modulating here and there, makes its home in C. We’d do well to heed the final phrase the group ever sang: “In the end, the love you take, is equal to the love, you make”.

But even this doesn’t capture its essence as well as the following sublime chord sequence:

Amaj/Gmaj(add A)/Fmaj/Dmin7/Cmaj 

And then, in painfully poignant denouement: 

Cmaj/Cmaj(add 9)/Dmaj/Cmin7/Fmaj/Cmaj 

It’s true that to play this lick on piano, you’ll be forced to utilize a few black keys (particularly that tricky Cmin7). But trust me; it will be worth it, because it simply doesn’t get any better than that

TIMSHEL

The Ebert Principle

For the second consecutive week, I find myself positively impelled to weigh in on a tangential topic that has gone both global and viral. In our previous installment, I attempted, with only partial success, to unpack Gresham’s Law, in the process putting my imprimatur on Goodie’s Law, a construct which no one (as yet) has had the temerity to dispute.

I was hoping to leave it at that, but then, unbeknownst to me, another web-exploding debate emerged, resurrecting a long-established but by-and-large dormant concept called the Ebert Principle. For the uninitiated, the Principle, named after its Discoverer: the late Chicago Sun Times film critic (and possessor of the two of the four most feared thumbs in Hollywood) Roger Ebert, reads as follows:

An anthropomorphic cartoon character suspended in mid-air will remain in said state until being made aware of same. 

Let’s use the obvious example to illustrate. When Wile E. Coyote chases the Roadrunner toward a cliff, and then the latter (with trademark sh*t-eating grin) side-steps the former and allows him to barrel off the precipice, Mr. Coyote does not immediately fall earthbound. Instead, he remains at his peak elevation expressive incredulity affixed on his face, until he looks down. At that point, recognizing the realities of his situation, the inexorable force of gravity over overcomes his state of confusion, and down he goes.

For those among you that remain confused, the following illustration should remove any lingering doubts:

 

I hadn’t thought about this phenomenon in many years, but that respite was about to end abruptly. Just as we were past this Gresham’s Law throw-down; just as we were drying off from Harvey and Irma, the blogosphere exploded on the subject.

So many wise souls opined on this that I can’t catalogue them all, but a small sample of the Ebert Principal response is provided below:

The Mooch issued a formal statement accusing the Roadrunner of cuckolding him, and filed a paternity suit in Federal Court. The Roadrunner’s legal team responded with a motion to dismiss, denying any liaison with Mrs. Mooch, and pointing out that given he and Mrs. M are two different species, the paternity claims were, at best, frivolous. The Judge sided with the Roadrunner in Summary Judgment, and ordered Team Mooch to pay court costs. Team Roadrunner threatened Mooch with a Defamation Suit, but indicated that it would drop the matter if the latter made a formal apology.

Mooch tweeted out a tepid apology, to which The Roadrunner responded in kind: “@Mooch: Beep Beep You”.

Hillary Clinton took general responsibility for the incident, and then proceeded to assign blame to Comey, Sanders, Obama, Putin, Biden, the DNC, the RNC, the Mainstream Media and others.

Former Vice President Albert S. Gore blamed global warming.

LeBron sent out a formal $50M Hang Time Challenge to the Coyote, stating that if victorious, he would donate the proceeds to (Flightless) Bird Lives Matter.

Black Sabbath Bassist Terrence Michael Joseph (Geezer) Butler thought it was all pretty cool, and former British Prime Minister Benjamin Disraeli could not be reached for comment.

Actually, that’s about all the flow generated by the Ebert Principle, but isn’t it enough? Couldn’t I just leave well enough alone? Well, maybe, but it did strike me that I had an obligation to investigate and report upon whether or not there was an investment universe analogue to this construct, and, on first glance, the positive case is fairly compelling. Pretty much every time the market has reached an unsustainably elevated threshold, it did not come careening down until everyone realized that there was nothing but air beneath it. Of course, the most glaring example of this is the ’08 crash. Yes, Casandra Chorus admonished us about a housing bubble and a looming credit crisis. But until borrowers started defaulting in droves and the FDIC began closing banks, nobody was paying much attention to these warnings. Similarly, prior to the bursting of the dot.com bubble, investors were buying up worthless web companies like they were 16th Century Dutch tulips. I could go further back in history, but I think you’ve caught my drift.

But perhaps the more important issue is whether the market has currently run off the cliff, and resides in a Coyote-eqsue state of suspended denial. Again, there is anecdotal evidence supporting this assertion. To wit: equity valuations, by many standard metrics, offer some back up:

 

Then there’s this handy little graph which I unearthed, suggesting that every market, with the ironic exception of Housing, is in bubble configuration:

 

Don’t ask me to explain this psychedelic spaghetti bowl, which I don’t understand at all. Suffice to say that it’s as scary a piece of Microsoft Excel Charting Function handiwork as one would care to see. Further, we can impute that if this guy is on to something, then we’re truly in Coyote Configuration, so whatever else you do, I’d advise you, from a risk management perspective, not to look down.

All of this resides against an economic backdrop that features multiple crosswinds. The macro picture is mixed. On the positive side of the equation, for the first time in history, all 46 countries in what is defined as the developed world are sporting ISM scores above 50. But Retail Sales and Industrial Production came in weak. The former metric does not feature a geographic breakdown, but the latter figure does, and was clearly diluted by all that nasty weather down south. As a result of nature’s wrath, both the NY and Atlanta Fed’s GDP Estimates took a turn for the worse:

 

No doubt here the economy will be issued a Mulligan after the double storm wallop. But we’ll all probably feel the GDP gap nonetheless.

In addition, like it or not, this coming week, we will be forced to endure yet another FOMC meeting, the expectations for which involve the Fed holding rates steady, but announcing some concrete plans for the divestiture of portions of their >$4T Balance Sheet.

I suspect that the dynamics around this may at least partially answer our questions, based upon the following theory that has crystalized for me in recent days: QE has reached a state where it has created a chronic supply/demand imbalance for marketable securities. There simply aren’t enough of them out there to satisfy investor needs, because Central Banks have Hoovered them all up. As long as this persists, then as a matter of pure market technicals, downside volatility – particularly in Stocks and Bonds — has been dramatically suppressed. Perhaps if the Fed really puts some of its inventory on sale, it will break the logjam, but I’m not counting on it – just yet.

So, to answer our key question, I do think we’ve got some of investment version of the Ebert Principle at play here. The Market Coyote is indeed over a cliff, but on the other hand, he shows no signs of looking down. Someday in this fair land he will cast his eyes towards terra firma, and at that point all of us will feel some gravitational pull. I don’t think he’s up nearly as high as he was, say, in late ’07, but neither, for the moment, do his feet appear to be touching any solid surface. Moreover, there’s every chance he’ll climb to more dangerous elevations before the “Aha Moment” reaches his cranium.

On a happier, closing note, while the good folks at the Looney Toons Division of Warner Brothers, producers of The Roadrunner Show (and therefore indirect creators of the Ebert Principle) have only done partial violence to Newton’s Laws of Motion, they have absolutely obliterated core tenets of Biological Science. No matter how far Mr. C. falls, no matter how much it hurts, he gathers himself and begins the struggle anew. For this, he deserves, if not our praise, then at least our sympathy. Moreover, I suspect this is true for us all, so take heart, and, as always…

TIMSHEL

 

Goodie’s Law

We’ll get to our title subject anon, but first I must weigh in on the frenzied global debate respecting one of its forbears: Gresham’s Law, which as every schoolboy knows, posits that in an environment with which multiple forms of legal tender of varying soundness, the “bad” money eventually push the “good” stuff out of circulation.

Does it apply at present? We may soon find out. On the other hand, we may not.

But first, a little context. The Law was named after Sir Thomas (no relation to John) Gresham, 16th Century British Financier, hired to look after the economic affairs of King Edward VI (the long sought after male heir to Henry VIII, who was crowned at the tender age of 10, but shed this veil of tears at the tenderer age of 15, to be replaced by the indestructible Elizabeth I, who also availed herself of Sir Thomas’s services -up till the point of his death), and founder of the still-extant Royal Exchange.

Notably, Sir Thomas, modest fellow that he was, never took placing his personal imprimatur on his now eponymous law. Nay, the task was deferred for 3 full centuries, and undertaken by a rather anonymous chap, in remembrance of Gresham’s pushback on the debasement of Pound Sterling during Henry VIII’s time. Perhaps Gresham demurred because he knew that the idea did not originate with him; its origins tracing back at least (and somewhat improbably) to 15th Century stargazer Nicholas Copernicus. However, I suspect our forebears were openly availed themselves of this expedient-but-unfortunate habit, dating back to points when they were still living in caves and sporting tails.

But back to Sir Thomas for a minute; in addition to his sobriety, modesty and unmistakable clairvoyance, wherever else we might differ, perhaps we can all agree that in his day, he cut a rather dashing figure.

Sir Thomas w an Unidentified Skull: 

 

Moreover, in my judgment, he was doing the lord’s work in his tireless efforts to ensure a sound currency. And history shows he was successful. But across the ages, it was perhaps inevitable that there would be periods of backsliding. Consider, for instance, the post-WWI replacement of Germany’s Papiermark with the misanthropic Reichsmark – at an introductory rate of 1 PM = 1 Trillion RM. Of course, this was a one-finger salute from the Germans to the French for imposing-impossible-to-meet reparations at the end of the “War to End All Wars”. But as Sir Thomas foretold, the Papiermark soon disappeared from German commerce, and the Reichsmark quickly fell victim to a 21% per day inflation rate.

What followed: the 1929 Market Crash, the Great Depression and WWII, is well-documented.

 

Fast forward to the present day, where, while “bad” money is arguably available in galactic over-abundance, “good” money is an elusive designation. If the current flow in FX land is to be believed, then our own greenback is certainly falling out of favor.

The exchange rate deteriorated all week long, closing at a > 2-year low:

Gresham’s Bad Boy: The USD 

 

And notwithstanding Chairman Draghi’s difficult to assess comments (apparently, he’s prepared to increase or decrease Euro QE, as conditions demand), EURUSD breached 120 for the first time since late 2014. Perhaps our Dead Presidents are seeking to be the bad money beneficiaries of Gresham’s Law. If this is indeed their intent, they’re doing a pretty good job of achieving their objective.

But they have company. This month, the amount of fiat currency printed by Central Banks in 2017 will cross over $2 Trillion, and the total amount created out of thin air since the crash is knocking on the door of $20T. One could argue that for the time being, Gresham’s Law applied in spades, because all of the “good” money appears to have been chased out of the economy over the last few years.

Making a gallant bid for the opposite side of The Law are a number of blockchain/virtual currencies, as led of course by Bitcoin. It was a tough, volatile week for these wannabes, and the trend is likely to continue. Ultimately, as stated previously, I think there’s about as much chance of developed countries ceding any measure of control over their currencies and interest rates to entrepreneurial ventures as there is the U.S. Defense Department sanctioning the development of private sector armies and allowing citizens to choose which military enterprise they wish to defend their rights and property. But in the meantime, the virtual circus rolls along, showing no signs of folding its collective tents. I don’t know whether virtual currencies are bad money or good, but it bears remembering that the more we see of them, the lesser the set of qualities they are likely to possess – at least according to Gresham.

Meanwhile, it was a modestly negative week for equities, a strong one for bonds and a mixed one for commodities. Our justifiable and overwhelming focus has been on the sequence of natural disasters plaguing our southern reaches, and, at the point of this correspondence, the toll, in terms of blood and treasure, cannot even be estimated. Less noticed, as a result, was the détente between Trump and the Dems, who have come together, forsaking those on the opposite side of the aisle, to effect a 3-month extension of the budget – debt ceiling positioning notwithstanding. For the markets, this is probably a good thing. While the rebuild in Texas, Florida and their neighbors will generate some incremental demand, left unfettered, the overall impact of the storms is highly deflationary. As a modest example, consider the current dynamics in Natural Gas. One might assume that the worst flood ever recorded, with its epicenter right smack dab in the geographical core of the energy industry, would take out more supply than demand, and that prices would increase.

One would be wrong on that score:

Natural Gas: Knocking on the Door of Quarterly Lows: 

My friends in the biz tell me that the storm has completely removed significant pools of demand emanating from Mexico, and that demand disruptions from Irma will make matters worse. Overall, one can safely assume that this double wallop from the fist of God will cost at least 1 GDP point to repair, and this is reflected, among other factors, in our favorite GDPNow estimates:

 

So one at any rate can understand the economics of Trump’s deal with his sworn political enemies. Nobody can afford the bite that will be taken out by these storms, and I am therefore OK with this bilaterally cynical deal. But I offer the following but of advice for our Commander in Chief. If you think that you can form new political alliances here, think again. Schumer and Pelosi wish you no more good fortune than Hitler and Stalin did each other when they split Finland between them. If you politically compromise House members of your party, and they lose their majority in the next election, then the first official act of the reinstated Pelosi Congress will be to issue articles of impeachment. As usual, Trump is being too clever by half here, and the act is getting very tiresome.

For what it’s worth, I also remain no less concerned about Korea this stormy weekend than I was last stormy weekend. My belief is that by escalating their nuclear activity amid global demands for reduction, the NK bunch has declared de facto war on the United States and its allies. There is simply no way that the current status quo holds. L’il Kim will continue to build his arsenal until his enemies act to reduce it. This could happen at any time, and we probably won’t hear about it until after the fact. The equity markets don’t care about this, of course, but it explains a good deal about the selloff of the dollar, the rally in bonds and the strength of certain commodities.

So these, mes amis, are my immediate loci of concern: Florida, Texas, Korea and Washington. It is a small list, but in my judgment a content-rich one. There are a few macro data releases next week, but it is an otherwise quiet one in that corner of the universe.

So let’s turn to the corporate side, where everyone will hold their breath till Tuesday, 1 pm Eastern Time, when Tim Cook steps up to the podium for the first time in Apple’s newly opened corporate HQ, to introduce the iPhone 8. It ought to be a mind-blowing affair, but the real drama will unfold over the next few months, as the world evaluates whether or not company can meet expectations.

 

The bar here is high. The A Team are contemporaneously releasing 3 phones. Do they cannibalize each other? Can they overcome widely reported components shortages? Will consumers really pay 1,000 US for the fully loaded 8? Particularly in China: a) which now generates half of all IPhone sale revenues; and b) where suitable substitutes can be purchased for less than 10% of this price?

We won’t know for several weeks, but on Friday I was speaking to my friend Goodie, who unlike me, actually knows something about this subject. We both agreed that this single set of imponderables alone may go a long way towards determining the path of equity valuations in what remains of 2017. If Apple nails it, investors will swoon and perhaps buy everything in sight. If not, the markets may well ignore any technical rationalizations and issue that the cartel of west coast companies bent on taking over the world – the so-called FANGS (and by extension, the overall market) — a much-needed claw trimming.

I will close by designating the importance of the I-Phone 8 to the overall equity market valuations to be Goodie’s Law. It is intended to work in conjunction, rather than supplant, Gresham’s Law. So my risk advice is as follows: if you wish to monitor the potential impact of psychodramas around the world, keep an eye on the USD; if you want to focus on U.S. equities, watch Apple.

If you follow this course, I see no reason why the two edicts cannot achieve harmonious co-existence.

TIMSHEL

 

Labor Day’s Love Lost

 Well, kids, this is it. The Summer of Love +50 is in the books, and here’s hoping you made the most of it. Because, whatever (presumably mixed) blessings it bestowed upon us: a) they are now consigned to the past; and b) our affairs are likely to take on soberer complexion – starting tomorrow. 

Meantime, it’s Labor Day. I truly hope you enjoy it. But I won’t lie: I never liked Labor Day. In fact, in a very real sense, Labor Day sucks. The origins of today’s holiday date back to the late 19th Century, when organized workers became force with which to be reckoned, and took to violence to obtain better terms from their bosses. Bravo to them, I say, for the Industrial Revolution had indeed dealt them a bad hand. Working conditions were abysmal, with unilaterally empowered corporations sending young children into mines for 12 hour shifts. The Labor Movement brought some much needed balance to the equation. But a great deal has changed since that era. Globalization, Automation and (it must be said) widespread, sustained corruption, diluted the leverage of the union paradigm. Members and (more particularly) their reps grew complacent. And they overplayed their hands. And the membership took notice. And they have voted with their feet: 

But of course, there is a portion of the union-verse that is thriving, and that, as is well-known, is the organized segment of working stiffs on public payrolls. Their participation rate, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is more than 5 times that of their private economy counterparts. A strong argument can be made that the only unions with any juice left are consortiums of government employees, who bargain aggressively against other government representatives to determine how deeply they will reach into taxpayers’ pockets. My vague recollections about the Supply/Demand curves I drew in college offer hints of an inefficiency here, and it’s no wonder we are plagued with the troubles we face. 

Thus, whatever it’s noble origins, the organized labor movement is now only in it for themselves, and I have a hard time celebrating the patriotic triumphs of AFL-CIO, the American Federation of Teachers, the NFLPA or the Screen Actors Guild. For these reasons alone, I have always looked at Labor Day with something of a jaundiced eye. But my issues transverse my petty political perspective. Though many years have passed since I was sending my own darlings off to school, a part of me feels sad this time a year, when I drive by bus stops and see the backpacked little fellers with their long faces, trudging off to their essential but decidedly grim organized educational facilities.

And there’s more. Even for us grownups, the end of summer ritual brings about a feeling of both sadness and nausea. I work hard during the summer, as do, presumably, most of you. But as June melts into July, which melts into August, I will admit to allowing my mind to relax a bit. “It’s summer” I tells myself “take it a little bit easy”. 

But that particular crutch expires today, and what lies beyond, on balance, every year but this year in particular, causes my blood pressure to rise. Both Management and Labor will have to resume their toils at full throttle, with outcomes that appear to be decidedly uncertain. 

In a perverse turn of the calendar, the lead up to the holiday I’m abusing offered some insights into the condition of the latter, eponymous class. On Friday of all days, the BLS dropped the August Jobs Report, and presumably y’all know it was a yawner. Private Payrolls came in light. June and July were revised down. Hours worked and hourly earnings barely budged. The base rate actually ticked up a titch. 

But our always-intrepid working stiffs continue to gather themselves on the spending side, more often than not, with funds sourced from origins other than their own personal wealth. According to the latest figures produced by the NY Fed, Consumer Credit hit an all-time high last month: 

That’s a passel of debt to pay back, and it would therefore follow that Management and Labor alike should be highly motivated to knuckle down in the final trimester of ’17. But actually accomplishing anything may be easier said than done. Among other factors, while the rhetoric has cooled a bit in Washington, bond investors are showing increasing concern about the possibility of a government shut down this month, specifically by shedding obligations that will come due over the next few weeks:

In addition, there’s those pesky Northern Koreans, whose leader seems intent on sending what’s left of his long beleaguered country into Kingdom Come. I hesitate to weigh in professionally here, but it does strike me that: a) the presence of deployable ICBMs in the hands of L’il Kim will be deemed immediately unacceptable for the U.S. and its allies; and b) whatever steps are taken to eradicate this threat will be volatility enhancing and valuation dilutive. 

Through it all, though, the Gallant 500, chugs on, half-a-league, half-a-league, half-a-league onward. Factoring in dividend/reinvestment, August marked the 18th month out of the last 19 where the index generated positive returns, and that, my friends, has only has happened one other time in history – in the heady days of ‘95/96: the infancy of the dot.com bubble. In putting up this performance, it stands in firm solidarity with the VIX, which again is bumping down against single digit thresholds: 

VIX Vertigo: 

Kind of strange from my perspective. I would’ve thought that investment pools might be marginal buyers of options going into the long weekend, but apparently they were otherwise occupied. 

In general, I’d say we enter this last, performance-critical third of the year in something of a jump ball configuration. Risky assets appear to be nothing if not fully valued, but are they overvalued? I’m not prepared to state that they are. I will, as has been my habit, offer the following observation though: there’s nothing on the horizon which would particularly incline me to be short any asset class: not stocks, not bonds, not commodities and not credit. 

I’d like to predict that volatility will normalize over the near term, but I’m not even sure on this score. 

So about all I can offer on this sucky Labor Day is an admonishment to remain on your toes. Something’s likely to happen – sooner. Or later. Or never. 

Come what may, I’m girding myself for battle. But all of that starts tomorrow. In the meantime, you must forgive me as I take my leave. The burgers need flipping, and that critical task devolves to me, and as I perform this vital task, I’ll be thinking, more in sorrow than in anger about Mother Jones. 

TIMSHEL 

Viva La VV’s

Fair warning to those have somehow failed to notice: as the rings embedded in my tree stump increase to uncountable magnitudes (i.e. as I grow older), I find my expository focus increasingly centered on eulogies, elegies and other forms of tribute to the dearly departed.  I don’t think I can stop this trend, because (let’s face it), the passage of time only increases the inventory people and things that went before, while my interest in everything else inexorably wanes.

So I noted with unmixed regret last week’s announcement by owner Peter Barbey (among other things the heir to the North Face/Timberland/Lee Jeans outdoor clothing dynasty) his intention to discontinue the printing and physical distribution of the venerable “Village Voice”.  Oh, the publication will forge on in the crowded and complex ionosphere, competing for what used to be called “mindshare” with a bajillion other on-line periodicals, but soon, those accustomed to the ritual of grabbing a copy of The Voice outside their favorite bodega, will find their routines rudely disappointed, and for all time.

Volumes can and will be written about the periodical: how it was founded in 1955 by Norman Mailer and a couple of his pals out of an apartment located in the neighborhood for which it is named, how it became a portal of passage for writers and artists, ranging from Literary Giants Alan Ginsberg, Ezra Pond, Henry Miller, James Baldwin and E.E. Cummings, to Music Critics Lester Bangs and Nat Hentoff, to cartoonists Jules Feiffer, R. Crumb, Matt Groening and Lynda J. Barry.  How it chronicled the cutting edge sensibilities of the Beat Generation, the Flower Power era, Punk and post-Punk.  And how, above all, and against significant odds, it endured for decades as the bible for local popular culture; its reach, extending well beyond Bleeker Street, well beyond Manhattan, well beyond America’s borders, extending, at least for a time, around the world.

The Voice, of course, has always been free in New York, but I actually used to plunk down the hefty sum of 5 clams to pick up a copy from time to time in Chicago.  It was the late ‘70s, and I was already casting my eyes eastward.  When I finally reached the, er, Promised Land of Gotham, I never missed an edition.  I eagerly checked the live show listings (chock full of formatted ads from venues long shuttered, including the Bottom Line, the Ritz, the Felt Forum, the Lone Star Café and, of course, CBGBs), sneaked a peek at the Personals, and read what articles captured my interest.

It was in the Village Voice, for instance, that I first read of an epidemic of untreatable viruses that were plaguing the neighborhood: a problem that a few months later rose to the dignity of a full blown global crisis: the spread of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome – otherwise known as AIDS.

But in the end, The Voice almost certainly fell victim to the inexorable forces of what transpires at the intersection of cultural change and technological advancement.  The music clubs shut down.  Those looking for hookups found more efficient means of sourcing them.  Its (dubious in my judgment) progressive sensibilities got lost in an interminable stream of such doggerel – made available every microsecond on the web.  In sum, it might be fair to state that The Voice lost its voice, and this is hardly cause for celebration.

I reckon, though, we’ll survive, but I don’t think we’d doing ourselves any harm by taking a moment to mark the changing of the guard downtown.

Anyway, I’ve got a suggestion for moving on from our lamentations, for a new VV has emerged.  SaVVy investors already know this, but for the last couple of years, those looking to trade in the nooks and crannies of what is known as Volatility can avail themselves of something called the VVIX.  It measures the implied volatility embedded in options on the VIX index, which in turn measures the implied volatility priced into options on the S&P 500.

Got that?

Good.  Because unlike the VIX, which aside from the odd palpitation, has been a sleepy ride down a Local (i.e. as opposed to an Express) elevator, the VVIX has been quite lively of late:

 

VIX:                                                                           VVIX:

 

If you’re a bit confused here, I suspect you’ve got company.  But trust me, the VVIX is where the action appears to be.  To wit: while the VIX graph indicates that the implied vol of the SPX is a dreary, high-single/low-double digit affair, the VVIX rises and plunges to levels routinely around (and sometimes above) 100%!

Now, back in the days when Mailer and Co were cranking out The Voice on an inky, noisy, hand-operated printing press (i.e. when I first studied options theory), I was taught that an implied volatility of > 100% is, shall we say, problematic.  It implies that the underlying instrument, with significant one-standard deviation probability, can manifest a price change equal to or greater than its entire value. I can see how this is possible on the upside, but if my increasingly waning arithmetic skills have any juice at all left, this suggests that a single, high probability move will take the underlying instrument (in this case the VIX) into negative territory.

Somebody wake me up if the VIX goes negative, because it suggests that there are investors out there who will pay me for the privilege of holding options, and under the circumstances, I’ll take all I can get.

In fact, such a trade might be about the only low hanging fruit left in the entire global market complex, which continues to show very little sign of reaction to stimulus (positive or negative).  Last week featured some interesting news flow, but many markets barely budged.  The SPX did in fact manage to break a 3-week losing streak, but only to the tune of about 60 bp.  For all of the talk of equity strength, our favorite index has traded inside a 24 handle since just before Memorial Day, and, as I hardly need to tell you, Labor Day is just around the corner! Mathematically, the entire summer season range is under 4%, and at the moment, the SPX is below its midpoint. So perhaps we should be-calm ourselves as to the strength of this market.

Selected other asset classes are showing a little less sloth, perhaps as led by the decline to YTD lows of the US Dollar Index, and the impressive climb of Gold:

 

US $ Index:                                                     Gold:

 

Now, I should inform you that us stone cold ballers think of Gold as a currency, so the yellow rock rally can at least in part be viewed as yet another forearm shiver to our beloved green paper.

The main beneficiary, apart from Gold, of the dollar’s poor performance, was the Euro, which gained over 1% on Friday, most of which it copped in the afternoon, subsequent to the Central Bank speechifying at Jackson Hole.  It does appear to me that as is consistent with the urban myth, FX traders are displaying more sensitivities to global affairs than are stock jockeys.

I think, again, they may be on to something.  While next week, if there’s a God in heaven, should be quiet, we’ll have to burst out, from a standing start, come Labor Day Tuesday.  Perhaps top on the agenda will be untangling a brewing budget crisis, and who among us is brimming with confidence that we can avoid turning this routine exercise into a clown rodeo? Data will start streaming in, and the market action could come from any corner of our awareness, from Washington to Pyongyang, from Corporate C-Suites to the mean streets of Berkley.  We’ll be well-advised to remain on our toes.

I also want to reiterate (in part because I believe I was the first to record this thought) my belief that if investors want anything out of this congressional session, they bloody well better gin off some sort of selloff.  If bad behavior from the White House to Capitol Hill is met with nothing more than a collective market shrug, accompanied by a sustained unwillingness to part with favored holdings, then said bad behavior is rendered politically inconsequential, and will continue.  By contrast, if the market took a dive, I believe you’d see them pols busting their collective humps not only to pass a budget, but also to do something useful on Health Care, Tax Reform and Infrastructure.

I reckon, though, we’ll just have to see how that plays out.  In the meantime, if the spirit moves, I think you should pick up a print copy of the Village Voice – while you still can.  Put it aside for your progeny.  Let them know how we used to do it.  It will do them less damage than obsessing about the latest moves in the VVIX.  And, for those who were wondering, yes you can trade options on this index, raising the likelihood that, ere long, we’ll have the opportunity to turn our attentions to the VVVIX.

Good luck with that one, kids. Because, like James Baldwin, Alan Ginsberg, Norman Mailer, the Bottom Line and (soon) the Venerable Village Voice itself, I hope by then I’ll be out.

TIMSHEL

Eclipse/Brain Damage

All that is now, and all that is gone, and all that’s to come, 

And everything under the sun is in tune, 

But the sun is eclipsed by the moon 

— Roger (#%&%$) Waters

I don’t know about you, but a part of me is eager for this madcap summer to end. Oh, I’ve had some seasonally pleasing moments – playing with my grandsons, working in a little shuffleboard, and engaging in other age-appropriate behaviors. But a review of doings outside my increasingly narrowing personal sphere, the interval allotted to denizens of the Northern Hemisphere to bask in bright skies and warm temperatures is starting to grow long in the tooth. I won’t waste much space reviewing the events that led us to this pass; I choose, rather, to focus on the present and even more so on the immediate future.

This week’s note draws reference from one of the all-time-top moments in rock and roll history: the sequence of Brain Damage/Eclipse that marks the end of Pink Floyd’s astonishing magnum opus: “Dark Side of the Moon”. Now, hard-core Floyd-heads might argue the point – placing efforts like “Atom Heart Mother”, “Piper at the Gates of Dawn” or even, dubiously, “The Division Bell” at the top of the Pink Catalogue. From some perspectives, I might even agree with them. But what is (or should be) true for all concerned is the following: “Dark Side of the Moon” is a perfect record. Not. A. Wasted. Note. So even if you’d rather listen to “Meddle”, “The Wall”, “Wish You Were Here” or “Animals” it’s important that everyone gives “Moon” its props.

For the purposes of this presentation, I have plucked out the final two songs of DSOTM, due to their relevance to our current conundrums. Moreover, I have reversed them, for reasons to be made clear below. So let’s get to it, shall we?

While reasonable minds can debate whether the collective id of our visible community is suffering from Brain Damage, it is a matter of near-certainty that an Eclipse – a mother of an eclipse, is headed our way. Tomorrow, in fact. Astronomers are describing it as a once-in-a-century event. It is expected to cast us into temporary darkness as it makes its way along the jet stream, arriving in Oregon mid-morning and reaching the East Coast around tea time – all before, presumably, continuing its celestial path over the Atlantic Ocean. I’m not an expert on these matters, but as a risk manager, it is my obligation to warn you, as it passes overhead, not to look at the sun. I’m willing to cop to being a bit nervous about this, because: 1) I’d very much like to take a peek myself; and 2) I’m utterly incapable of constructing one of those makeshift devices that offer a safe visual image. And it’s not as though I haven’t tried. Several of my grade school teachers tried to assist me, with sorrow, horror and amusement, as they reviewed the many cereal boxes I destroyed in the effort. These weren’t among my finest academic moments. In fact, they rank among my worst, surpassed only by my solo attempt (others were in groups, but no group would have me) to dissect a starfish in high school. After inspecting my, er, handiwork, my elderly Greek biology teacher saw fit to pick up the smallest corner of my misanthropic sea creature with thumb and forefinger, and shriek, multiple times, and to the entire class, that I had mutilated the poor thing.

 

And that’s all I have to say about eclipses. Just don’t look at them directly, OK? Let’s turn to the topic of Brain Damage, and here we must start with the author of the piece: one George Roger Waters. Nominally, he’s one of my favorite musicians. And now I must avoid him. Almost never in the history of popular culture has an artist lived such a charmed life and ended up so nasty and so angry. In addition to bearing witness to the timeless genius of his output being proved across the decades, he’s made perhaps more money over the last few years than maybe any performer this side of J and Bey. His wandering Wall tour brought in a cool $450 Million (eclipsed only by U2 and the Stones, each of which who had to split their boodle, while Roger grabbed the entire gate). And now he’s back at it. Again.

But he’s very angry. At the establishment in general and at Israel in particular. In fact, he’s outraged, so much so that he has spent some of his hard won ticket proceeds to construct floating pigs with the Star of David affixed on their shanks. Classy, Roger. He bullies other musicians into boycotting Israel, and, while some have caved, others have told him to pound sand. The Stones, for instance, reacted to his demands by adding extra shows in Tel Aviv. Bravo, Mick and Keith. Seldom in my awareness has a more elegant message been sent from one artist to another to respect his betters.

So I’m here to confirm what Roger so beautifully conveyed to us in 1973: yes, Roger, the lunatic is in your head.

But there are other lunatics out there. For instance, there are, indeed, lunatics on the grass. Witness the insanity taking place at statues residing in parks across this vast national expanse. Much, of course, has been made of these episodes, and I’ve got little to add to the discourse. Undoubtedly, those involved are remembering games and daisy chains and laughs, but for heaven’s sakes, let’s take Roger’s advice and keep these loonies on the path.

The lunatic, in fact the lunatics, are also, by all accounts, in the hall. In fact, in our hall. One only has to peruse the corridors of the White House, Congress and the Court System to verify this reality. In this electronic age, the paper no longer holds their folded faces to the floor, but now it’s not every day, but every minute, that whatever passes for the paperboy brings us more.

All of which brings us back to the lunatics in our head. Oh they’re there alright, including, specifically, the lunatics of the investor class. But the past couple of weeks appear to have brought brief episodes of lucidity to their thoughts and actions. Improbably given recent market paradigms, they are actually reacting to troubling news with rational sequences of risk reduction. These cycles have been most evident on each of the previous two Thursdays, and I believe they portend some much needed incremental volatility in the coming weeks and months. This past week began with almost a full recovery of the preceding Thursday’s losses, but shortly thereafter, the recently suppressed but ultimately inexorable forces of gravity set in. By Friday’s close, equity indices had given back this recaptured ground, and a little bit more for good measure. And, while it is likely that the ten-odd trading sessions that remain to us between now and Labor Day will be characterized by a lack of liquidity, I see the following signs of a risk normalization cycle on the horizon:

  • Earnings season is substantially over and cannot provide further tailwinds.

 

  • On a related note, in the back half of the quarter, the data skews towards macro, and this is not necessarily accretive.

 

  • August ranks 12th in terms of historical equity performance; September ranks 11th; October is 10th.

 

 

  • Though bonds still catch a bid, there were some palpable holes in demand in recent auctions.

 

  • For the first time in many months, investors seem to be reacting to negative news, be it domestic unrest, international terrorism, Washingtonian dysfunction, or other buzz killing dynamics that seem to come our way in never-ending sequences.

 

  • I’m watching some of this Bitcoin nonsense, and while I don’t think that these types of instruments can withstand the inevitable political onslaught they face (hard for me to believe that the world’s leading countries and central banks will cede one of their most powerful governance tools to the private institutions that seek to compete with them), I do think that recent surges are in part driven by an increasing disgust with fiat currency regimes.

 

Post Labor Day and particularly in September, we’ve got a bunch of catalysts coming down the pipe, the balance of which, in my judgment, skew negative. The upcoming budget and debt ceiling standoff is beginning to look menacing. The likelihood is that Special Counsel Mueller will stir the pot further at some point in the next few weeks. While one can perhaps take some comfort in the arrival of General Kelly and the departure of Mr. Bannon, the Trump Administration has little time to get its act together and a lot of rope with which to hang itself. If any of the core senior appointees that retain a shred of credibility (Cohn, Mattis, McMaster, Tillerson, Hayley and very few others) decide they’ve had enough: a) it would be a dire political setback; and b) the markets – unlike the case over the last several months – are likely to react. We’ve had a blissfully (on a relative basis) quiet week with respect to the Korean Peninsula, but with our annual joint military exercises with South Korea set to begin on Monday, there is also considerable hazard in that quarter of the world.

Beyond all of this, we face the entirely wearying prospect of the annual Jackson Hole gabfest beginning later in the week. I will not elaborate here, but may have more to say about it in next week’s installment. Given the lunacy epidemic that is plaguing the entire planet, I’d prefer that they cancel this year’s tribute to the brilliance of the glib and powerful, but they don’t listen to me, so the event is likely to take place as planned. There’s not much accretive that can come out of this, and a reasonably likely set of outcomes that will be bothersome or worse. But like its Alpine equivalent (the possibly more wretched Davos confab, held each January) the show, high in the Teton Mountain range, will go on.

In light of it all, I end this piece by begging someone to raise the blade, to make the change, to rearrange me till I’m sane. Further, I wouldn’t mind if that same person or persons locked the door and threw away the key, because there’s someone in my head and it’s not me.

Roger first wrote these words about his much-lamented bandmate/mentor: Syd Barrett, who went certifiably crazy early on, and never regained his sanity. The band that Syd formed and for a time led did indeed start playing different tunes, and reached global superstar status, while Syd faded away and died. So maybe Syd’s on the dark side of the moon. But if so, we won’t see him, at least not tomorrow.

There’s this eclipse thing coming, don’t ya know?

TIMSHEL

The Summer of Love?

This ain’t the Garden of Eden,
There ain’t no angels above
And things ain’t like what they used to be
And this ain’t the summer of love
— Blue Oyster Cult

Following, with some ambivalence, on the worldwide BOC sensation I created a couple of weeks ago, I reach back into to their catalogue, for inspiration in these troubled times. I love the Cult; always have/always will, but with the band blowing up all forms of social media after I wrote about them in late July, I wonder if I should continue to enable this somewhat perverse global obsession.

Alas, though, duty calls, and I must answer. So here, we reference the first song from the band’s last flirtation with greatness: 1976’s “Agents of Fortune”. The record opens with our title track, which deals with the obvious: 1976 wasn’t the Summer of Love. Nine years had passed since the phrase came into being, the tragic end to the poorly conceived and horribly executed Viet Nam War. There were race riots, the murders of MLK/RFK, the violent Democratic National Convention. Nixon was elected and re-elected, and then came Watergate. The clumsy, misanthropic Gerald R. Ford took his place, and (though it was unambiguously the right decision) disgusted everyone by pardoning Tricky Dick. In ’73, OPEC laid down an oil embargo, and the world was introduced, perhaps for the first time ever, to the concept of an Energy Crisis. The economy was in the doldrums, and in general, everyone was in a sour frame of mind. It was indeed a sorry contrast to the fabled, sunny months of 67: the original Summer of Love.

This year, as it happens, marks SOL’s 50th anniversary, bringing forth galaxies of happy reminiscences of an era that began and ended much too quickly. And now, with students beginning their dreary mark back to school and Labor Day fast approaching, we are perhaps in a better position to draw comparisons between the summer season of 50 years ago, and the one rapidly fading before our eyes.
It strikes me that the comparison is more of a mixed bag than one would nominally suppose.

On the one hand, music has taken a dramatic turn for the worse. ’67 brought us the peak of the Beatles, and the emergence of Hendrix, the Dead, the Airplane and Janis. Coltrane died in July, but Miles Davis and Ornette Coleman were in full flower. Even the Bubble Gum stylings of the Monkees, the Strawberry Alarm Clock and Paul Revere were of a higher quality than they had a right to be. The Monterey Pop Festival blew everybody’s mind and set the stage for the epic music jubilees that followed.

Fast forward to the present day. The (admittedly fabulous) Biebs holds two spots in the Billboard Top 10, which also features DJ Khaled, Childish Gambino and Cardi B (Cardi B?). Movies were also better back then, as ’67 produced The Graduate, Cool Hand Luke, In the Heat of the Night, The Dirty Dozen and too many others to name. This year, we are plagued with the 397th releases in the Planet of the Apes, Guardians of the Galaxy and Spiderman series.

TV news featured titan journalists Cronkite, Chancellor, Huntly and Brinkley. Now, were served up (name your poison) Rachael Maddow, Sean Hannity, Mika and Joe.

But there are also similarities. Race relations were at a low ebb, and (improbably) about to get worse. In Washington, a single party held the presidency and both houses of Congress, and managed to pass no bills of import that year. A lewd, blunt President was quickly losing the confidence of the electorate, so much so that a year later he decided not to run for a re-election bid that should’ve been a cake walk. We were immersed in conflicts in remote parts of Asia, and we faced burgeoning nuclear threats and were standing nose to nose in rhetorical conflict with both Russia and China.

And what about the markets? Well, they were ascendant after a rough patch in ’66, which itself had been preceded by an uneven run up that had transpired for across much of the first half of the decade. The economy was growing, and both unemployment and inflation were low:

 

But two trends dominated the American psyche: 1) increasing doubts about the country’s place in the global pecking order, and 2) social issues. With respect to the latter, angry mobs held violent protests in every major city, rudely expressing their, er, displeasure with matters ranging from race relations, police brutality, sexual freedom and wealth/income inequality.

Unrest notwithstanding, U.S. equity indices were pushing to all-time highs, on the heels of a 3 decade upward climb.
Does all of this have a ring of familiarity? I thought it might.

Indeed, I think it might be fair to assert that there more similarities between the Summer of Love and present conditions than meet the superficial eye. Moreover, if history repeats (or, in any event, rhymes), then the next few years are likely to offer a rocky ride.

Meanwhile, it was an interesting week in the markets. U.S. and indeed global indices experienced their worst interval of the year, and, on balance, I believe this was a welcome development. Of course, the headline catalyst was brinksmanship rhetoric issuing forth from two historically infantile national chieftains: L’il Kim and Don John. But the pricing dynamic/trajectory was instructive. It’s difficult to determine which of these players on the world stage outflanked the other in terms of undignified demeanor, but until Wednesday, equity investors, as has been their wont, barely took notice.

Then, on Thursday, the Gallant 500’s Maginot Line of support began to show some cracks. It opened down about 100 bps and closed on its lows – some 50 basis points below this threshold. It was the equity complex’s worst single day showing since the election.

I spent some time trying to discern what had changed between Wednesday and Thursday, and pretty much came up empty. As had been the cycle for days, Trump tweeted and Kimmy-boy blustered. But this time, equity investors blinked. I am not in a position to offer useful insights as to how serious this crisis really is, but I will state one strong opinion in this regard: it is highly irregular for the commander of an army to telegraph to the whole world the precise locus of his intended attack. As such, come what may, it is my belief that, on balance and for the moment, there are probably fewer safer places on the planet than the U.S. Protectorate of Guam.

But as for the markets, it occurred to me after Thursday’s close that the equity complex had reached an inflection point: either this inexorably giddy corner of the investment universe had finally effected a much-needed upward adjustment in the Risk Premium, or investors would view Thursday’s nominal but shocking 1.5% correction as a buying opportunity, and we’d be off to the races again. But Friday’s session brought little in the way of clarity. The SPX actually rallied a titch, while, contemporaneously, the VIX managed to retain the lion’s share of Thursday’s > 40% jump.

 

In addition, the USD remained under pressure, with its weighted index residing at the lowest levels in a year:

 

Rates around the globe were also hard pressed, presumably as the Kim/Trump show causes a global flight to the relative safety of government bonds. And even High Yield investors got in on the risk aversion act, showing some long suppressed and much needed signs of happy feet:

 

Thus, while the market gods were not so forgiving as to provide us with any clear messaging: a) they never do; and b) the preponderance of cross asset class price action suggests that two-way volatility of a more dramatic nature is in the offing. Further to the point, and as widely reiterated across the financial press, the historically worst performing month for equity indices is August, and that the second worst is September.

So I think we may be coming close to a rationalization of the volatility paradigm, and will certainly overshoot the mark if the leader of either the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea or the United States of America finds himself unable to resist using the weaponry dubiously placed at his disposal.

But as to the larger question of whether or not this is the Summer of Love, I can only state my own views, noting that when the season that brought us the phrase took place, I was all of 7 years old. 50 summers have since come and gone, and while I can’t rightly figure out at what age this places me, it’s a fair bet that it puts me pretty far along. I don’t mind stating I feel the years in my bones.

Thus, as always, I yield to the wisdom of BOC. No, this ain’t the Summer of Love, and perhaps it’s just as well that it’s not. After all, with respect to certain historical intervals, no matter how much we enjoyed them, it is wise to “sit so patiently, waiting to find out what price, you have to pay to get out of, going through all these things twice”.

TIMSHEL

Redemption

“Full count; runner on 2nd, 1 out. Cubs lead 3-0 in the top of the 8th. Prior delivers. Castillo swings. High fly drifting towards the left field wall. Alou reaches over. But wait! A fan knocks the ball out of his hand”.

The rest, of course, is history. It was the 8th inning of the 2003 NL Championship Series between the Cubs and the Marlins. Marlin Castillo drew a walk, Prior (who up to that point had been delivering a 3-hit shutout gem) fell apart, and when the dust settled for the inning, the Cubs (who were seeking to clinch the Pennant that night) were down 8-3. They lost the game, and then booted Game 7. The Billy Goat Curse, which had kept them out of the World Series since 1945 and denied them the Championship since 1908, remained intact.

Everyone blamed the misanthropic, over-reaching fan: one Steve Bartman. And he was an easy target, sitting in the front row, committing the unpardonable (for purists at any rate) sin of wearing big, honking head phones to a playoff game, and, through his unwitting actions, denying the Cubs their destiny. He became a pariah in Chicago – so much so that the Governor at the time: Philosopher/Moralist Rod Blagojevich, suggested he enter the Witness Protection Program. It would take another Baker’s Dozen-13 years, and 3 changes of ownership, before The Curse ended and the Cubs grabbed their rings. Bartman was persona non grata for the entire intervening period, but then, last week, the Chicago National League team did something classy: it awarded him a World Series ring.

Across these troubled times, the gesture was nothing if not a welcome act of Redemption, but it wasn’t the only one. Contemporaneously, a Nevada Parole Board granted to inmate 1027820: one Orenthal James Simpson, and I want everyone to be aware that I am OK with this. I mean, we all know that did Goldman and Brown, but way he was set up for the 8 year stretch he served was nothing short of epic. Some Vegas players take his memorabilia and let him know that the boodle is lying in an adjacent hotel room. They get him drunk, put a gun in his hand and break in. Within a matter of minutes, the cops arrive on the scene, and whammo! Open and shut case for armed robbery.

So Juice did his time, and now he can reorient his self-proclaimed “conflict-free life” to his solemn quest to find the “real” killer of his wife and the signally unlucky Goldman. Who knows? Maybe he’ll succeed. But one way or another, it’s time to move on. So let’s remember the Juice for his singular exploits on the gridiron.

Oh yeah, and for one more thing: in a very real sense, we owe O.J. a deep debt of gratitude for inadvertently giving us the Kardashians.
On the whole, we’re on something of a feel-good run, and nowhere is this more evident than in the investment universe. Our equity indices continue their climb to heretofore un-breached elevations, Q2 earnings have been, on balance, a blowout affair, and I’m assuming y’all saw (or in any event, read Trump’s Triumphant Tweets about) Friday’s Jobs Report. If one casts an eye beyond the Equity Complex, what is visible is a global bid on bonds, and even some love of the recently forsaken USD:

 

The recently “en fuego” grain markets have backed off, but let me ask you this: how bad is it if you pay a little bit less for that corn on the cob scheduled to grace the BBQs teed up as summer winds down?

However, in a widely reported and indisputably odd turn of events, perhaps the biggest recipient of heavenly and earthly Redemption is European High Yield debt complex. Continental “Junk” (apologies for descending into the decorum of the vernacular) bonds have been bid so strongly that somehow, improbably, they are trading at identical yields to those of the 10 year notes issued from our own gallant Treasury Department, for many generations considered the world’s most reliable borrower:

 

I will admit to having stared at this chart to the point of obsession. Among other matters, so desperate for this paper have investors become that from a point contemporaneous to the teeth of the crash till the present day, Euro Junk yields have dropped by an astounding 90%. Call me crazy (it’s been done before) but I have just the most sneaking hunch that these securities are a tad, shall we say, overvalued. This decade, we’ve been treated to multiple handwringing cycles of speculation about the prospects for an Uncle Sam default, but I’m here to tell you that: a) such an outcome is unlikely; and b) as a final line of defense, our paper is backed up not only by the full faith and credit of our federal custodians, but the considerable firepower of our military machine. By contrast, I’m pretty sure that some of these Euro obligors are living on little more than time that they borrowed as part of the lending package, and that when this precious but fleeting asset runs out, their lenders are likely to be left holding little more than an empty bag.

That strange days have found us is a matter of scant dispute; however, during this transient interval of Redemption, I am hesitant to press the point. Yes, market multiple metrics continue to soar to the arguably unsustainable elevations. In Washington, new Grand Juries are being convened at a point when the World’s Greatest Deliberative Body has adjourned to meet angry constituents, with little or nothing to show for its efforts. Our potential foes in Eurasia continue to join us in the language of brinksmanship. The domestic legislative agenda is stuck in either neutral or reverse, and we’re hurtling next month towards a debt ceiling/budget showdown that – come what may, is likely to please no one.

In short, there are many imponderables out there that threaten to kill our current buzz, and again, I believe that conventional risk measures of virtually every stripe are understating the true exposure — from a market and an economic perspective.

But on this bucolic summer weekend, as the sunny seasons slips inexorably away from us, I choose to focus instead on our Redemption theme. I hope Juice uses his freedom wisely, and I’m glad that the Cubs and the City of Chicago have, at long last, let Bartman off the hook. After all, he presumably paid for his ticket, and going for a foul ball that appears to be within your grasp is part of the decidedly limited appeal associated with the price of admission to a baseball game. He wasn’t looking at the left fielder; his eyes were squarely on the souvenir that gravity was sending directly towards him.

And there’s one other sin associated with this incident that wants atonement. On the following February 26th, amid much national (and indeed global) hype, the team gathered at Harry Carey’s downtown restaurant to ritualize the destruction of the offending baseball. They kept their precise methods a solemn secret, so, like everyone else, I tuned in to watch the spectacle. I had envisioned the launching of it from a cannon, to explode in mid-air, its debris scattered into the icy waters of Lake Michigan. Instead, they stuck it in a transparent box, pushed a button and it disintegrated. I found this disappointingly anti-climactic. Further, published reports (I’m not making this up) indicate that the restaurant then took a portion of the particlized remains and mixed it into the evening’s pasta sauce. Helluva shame. To my thinking at any rate, the infamous ball plainly deserved a more spectacular exit.

But that’s the way it goes – in baseball and in life. In more cases that we would wish, our hopes, dreams and even our nightmares end up dissolving into dust. There’s a lesson in there somewhere for the investor class, but I’ll be damned if I’m going to expend my energy attempting to ferret it out. Instead…

…I’ll leave this task to you. Give it some thought. You may come up with a suitable answer, and the exercise itself will do you no harm.

TIMSHEL