Nothing in the streets, looks any different to me
Peter Townsend
Careful watchers of this space are aware not only of my recently celebrated personal milestone, but also that I had used the same headline – STFU — two weeks in a row.
This was an oversight on my part. But being as how, though not retired, I am now officially of retirement age, a guy who is now officially a Senior Citizen, I’m gonna call it a Senior Moment.
But I cannot resist the siren’s call to write my own post-mortem on the just ended quadrennial election cycle. The good news is that if yas can stand another synopsis, I’ve got one for yas.
After which I promise to STFU.
It did not play out the way I anticipated, but few outside the faithful expected Team Orange to run the table in such dramatic fashion. Part of me is surprised they won at all, but all the sources at my disposal confirm that they did.
In the lead-up to the Big Day, two factors were apparent: 1) the outcome would be decided by turnout and independent tilt; and 2) beyond each party’s base, most of the votes would be cast not in enthusiasm for their preferred candidate, but by which of the two they disliked the least.
Especially with respect to 2), whichever side emerged as the losers would have only themselves to blame, because, given the substandard quality of each candidate top ticket candidate, their opposite numbers were running a race that it was theirs to lose.
Had that loser been Team Trump, I’d have an embarrassing abundance of material with which to castigate Republicans, who, for the fifth time in eight years, had staked their fortunes entirely on a petulant, undisciplined narcissist, given to forget generous friends while never losing his remembrance of anyone who he perceived to have slighted him. A guy who relishes tweaking his opponents, and, in doing so, often leads with his chin. A former president who did some good things in his term (his risky vaccine moonshot which the other side lied about and for which it took unmerited credit comes to mind), but whose performance in the period between his 2020 election loss and Biden’s inauguration, ranks, in my judgment, as perhaps the worst 10 weeks in Presidential History.
I don’t think he planned or led an insurrection (if you’re President of the United States and want to stage a coup d’etat, you don’t do it with a few dozen mostly unarmed civilians and one guy in a Viking hat), but his failure to act immediately to stop the outrage, his orders to his Vice President not to certify the result, and his unwillingness, to this day, to accept the outcome as legitimate – all diminished the office he held and gave enormous aid and comfort to his political enemies.
He is, in sum, a guy prone to infinite unforced errors, which, as president in today’s world, could play out on a massive, tragic scale.
No way a guy like that deserved a second term, but, nonetheless, here we are.
Migrating away from the counterfactual to the actual – Vice President Harris and the Democratic Party, my god, where to start? At 100,000 feet, the mantra over there, for ages, has been that they and they alone can discern right from wrong — on complex, two-sided issues (with said opinions, by the way, correlating ~100% with their political agenda) and that anyone disagreeing with them is misinformed, stupid, evil, or some combination thereof. They have made little effort to hide that a small cabal of elitists – top tier politicians, billionaires, celebrities, academics and bureaucrats — call all the shots for them, as exemplified in myriad ways.
The first that comes to mind is how they pick their candidates. Except for Obama’s astonishing rise in 2008, it’s been two decades since they allowed their party regulars decide who runs at the top. Before she lost to Trump in ’16, and had not the Party Elders stepped in, Hillary would’ve been defeated — by Bernie – FFS! — as would Biden have been in ’20. But, knowing Bernie would lose, they anointed Joe last time around, then, when he emerged victorious, co-opted his presidency from a policy perspective.
Nobody – particularly Democrats – wanted to see him run again, but he leveraged a surprisingly strong outcome in the ’22 Midterms (to which, ironically, he contributed very little) to cement himself into the ’24 contest. Feeling stuck, the party Puppet Masters blatantly, aggressively gave the lie to his decline into an incontinent, doddering Aqualung, who is probably incapable of managing his own minute affairs, much less run the largest and most important organization on the planet. In time-honored fashion, they excoriated anyone who dared to express a concern in this regard, and up to the very end, were emphatically insisting that not only was Old Joe up to the job, he was, in fact, at the top of his game.
Meantime, they not only did all in their power to ensure that he would match up against Trump, who they rightly considered the most beatable of all potential opponents but sought to further tip the scales through combinations of lawfare, attempts to remove him from the ballot, and other extra-democratic measures.
But the truth about their boy’s condition would out, and when it did, they simply shoved him aside, and, instead of canvassing party members as to their preferred replacement, promptly anointed the multiple box-checking (woman✓, minority✓, uber-woke✓) but politically pedestrian Harris.
As was perhaps inevitable, she initially surged. Raised $1B and somehow spent it all — leaving, improbably, a $20M hole when the dust settled. Busted out a chill vibe. Either obfuscated or adjusted her policy positions to poll-tested panderings. When the electorate became increasingly impatient with these joyful platitudes, she attacked her opponent as being a fascist.
But nobody (including me) can even accurately define fascism, and I suspect that a large portion of those who voted for Trump consulted their recollections of his first term and determined that there was little in our governance reminiscent of Hitler or Mussolini.
As a last refuge, they busted out our icons, Obama, Oprah, Bey, etc., who scolded organically friendly audiences that even considering anything but a vote for Kamala as an ill-conceived betrayal.
Yes, they were trying to tell everybody else how to properly think and feel, as the exclusive arbiters of such matters. But the voters rejected this, and the results are as we find them.
There was an eerie calm in Manhattan before and after Election Day, and it was hard to even locate the polling place. This stands in sharp contrast to 2020, when, even after I voted, poll watchers were trying to pull me into every other building on the Upper West Side, presumably, to vote again. Harris won 2/3rds of the NYC vote, but even after the results were tallied, nothing in the streets looked any different to me.
So, to the losers, our self-perceived betters, I say: stop telling us how to think. We can do nothing but aspire to your wisdom and erudition, but it is we (and not you) who must live with the consequences of our choices, which, if nothing else, in a just world, grants us the right to some agency.
The wages of your arrogant lecturings are embedded within the election results, the latter manifest, in no small part, in a rejection of your pomposity. And even if you’re right about a lot of stuff (which you may very well be), it is upon us to face the consequences. I think the voters understood and accepted this and decided accordingly. Even if it means a 4-year headache from listening to Trump’s bloviating.
In these early days, there are signs that both sides are tiring of their endless bickerings. The Harris concession speech, was, by modern standards at any rate, gracious and forward looking. Published reports suggest that the lame duck Justice Department is preparing to drop all pending actions against Trump, and that even the 34-conviction New York case may be dismissed. This would be wise on their part.
The other, victorious side has shown some elements of grace as well. I strongly suggest that y’all pay particular attention to their official pronouncement not seek to end the filibuster, the reality that: a) this would most certainly have happened if the results had been reversed; and b) to do so would greatly ease the enactment of their legislative agenda notwithstanding. This is a prime example of enlightened governance, and one which I believe will redound to the benefit of both party and nation.
I’d sure like to see more of this type of thing, and maybe it will happen. But I’m not overly optimistic.
The markets are nothing short of giddy at the outcome, and perhaps we should forgive it some temporary, light-hearted amusement. Certainly, and on balance, the incoming administration and legislative caucus offer a more appealing menu for investors than do their opposite numbers.
But I am hardly expecting a cake walk when the leaders of the new revolution take hold, as they will surely face the same types of legislative inertia that nearly always descends upon single-party sweepers. The tariff policies could be crippling. Trump will raise the temperature of an already boiling Middle East, and there are profound risks involved in this.
Both candidates ignored the expanding deficit, which throws off the following alarming trajectory:
This is now Trump’s problem (and, of course, ours). And it is unsustainable. Perhaps Elon will indeed ride in on a Space-X horse, fire everybody, and save us all a shit ton of money.
But I wouldn’t bank on it. Those getting fat at the Federal trough must have a cache of Polaroids. And unless we find some way to control our borrowing binge – in every form that it takes – dire outcomes are inevitable. I just don’t know when.
Meantime, yes, there’ll be a new(old) cast of characters. But we will face the same challenges and opportunities with the same human strengths and weaknesses with which to deal with them. It may work out, and I hope it does. Meanwhile, I reckon I’ll pick up my guitar and play. Just like yesterday.
Because the new boss is the same as the old boss, and, if we’re not careful, we will be fooled again…
TIMSHEL